
Originally Posted by
SickbyDefinition
If you want critique on your arguement, well, I suppose you should establish an argument. I am confused as to whether you are trying to argue that bullying is everywhere, widespread, (and so what? You simply established the point, did not analyze the point very well), whether bullying is a good thing or not, or whether you are trying to simply define bullying. Either way, all of these points are very disorganized. You randomly put in things and it seems to me as if you are simply rambling and ranting about bullying.
If this is simply an expository, more or less explaining what bullying is, where it is, etc., you do in fact need to address the effects of bullying more thoroughly.
Also, is the last sentence of your intro a thesis? If you attempted to make an implied thesis, you failed, if the last sentence is your thesis (it seems the only definitive argument in the intro paragraph), you completely veered off course as far as arguing your point goes.
If you decided not to have a thesis, well, that was a bad decision because it makes your essay lack direction and focus, leading readers to think it was pointless rambling they could have come up with themselves.
I really liked the unique point you brought up about teachers and bullying. But, as with many of your points, it made me want to say, "So what?"
Analyze, analyze, analyze!
My main issue is organization and direction. Your essay lacks both. Although, your syntax structure is pretty varied and you have few mechanical errors, so that's good!
I do want to make one more comment about your style. Your essay seems a bit forced, you are trying to show an intellectual style without having chosen a direction. I've told people before, find your direction, then find your voice. Your tone will come out more clearly.
I don't often use outlines but I suggest you make one.
Bookmarks