I'MMMMMMMM BAAAAAAAACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!
norr is basically a lesser version of shep
hes not as awesome as me, but hell do root (nod)
I've known plenty of players that spend next to nothing gain very impressive heroes within a few months of a server. Now the 1k heroes within a few days/weeks of a server opening is pretty ludicrous because it seems so wasteful and impatient, but mostly boring.
A good player should be able to compete if they are smart - valley farm for medals - will give your hero much more exp per hour. Doing this their city focus will be on arch and so they'll get to an acceptable level for their techs quicker and be able to hit 10s quicker.
Most players gear their accounts to hit npcs. Some of us don't and reap the benefits.
I have seen overpowered heroes get stripped of levels too. On 148 Eric had one of his heroes have 300 levels taken off it - went from instant pults to around instant cav. They gave him back the on wars and told him to wait for the field to level in a month or so. A few on here would probably remember that.
So should there be a subscription based server/s. I think the answer is yes. If there was a 30 dollar cap per week it would make the game interesting again.
Last edited by Elfkey; 11-04-2011 at 04:16 PM.
In the end servers always even out, coin is just an excuse for why someone is better then you at the game
rly? so in the first week when someone has a 1000 hero they jus better right? coin has nothing to do with it. your a frickin genius
im better than you
its like you missed the entire first half of my sentence and only saw what you wanted to. Most people who get those heros quit and move onto the next server after 2 months aka WHEN THE SERVER CATCHES UP like i said its in caps now dont know how you can miss it again.
A better idea might be for Evony to open up fixed fee subscription servers. I suspect in my alliance, based on the number of chests I've received, that the average player has spent $20 over the past month. I might pay $20 a month to play on a server where everyone was limited to spending the same $20 a month and was also required to spend the same $20 a month. A level playing field would be interesting.
I think it was more so of a rejection to mirrored servers then actual shutting down of age I completely.
But yes, as long as age I is bringing in a source of income I don't think they would shut it down so randomly...
This has been suggested before many times. Evony has decided not to change the basic idea as it is right now, and quite honestly I think they make more money this way.
You should probably know then that this idea has been suggested before many times, and has been rejected. There is no baseless deletion by a mod, it was just simply decided by evony that this is not the thing they wanted, therefore that thread was not needed. All there is to it.
Closed on the account of this suggestion has already been suggested/thought of, with it being rejected.
If you have any suggestions to evony, go to the game suggestion box section... Just make sure to read the "Lists of suggestions", and make sure your idea isn't in there.
Last edited by acer5200; 11-05-2011 at 09:34 AM.
Bookmarks