I am better than you

[bum783]

I don't get the pun.

I said you "nailed" it (slang for slept with) Ok ill admit bad joke ill try harder next time.

Not only is there not a pun but everything bum783 said (again) is just anecdotal. Fer christs sake bum, say something meaningful, for once....one time, please one time say something that has relevance.

I am more convinced than ever that you dont know what anecdotal means. An anecdotal argument is something that is non statistical, it is argument based on analogy, and life experiences. It cannot be proven scientifcally. Since this is a discussion on what attracts people to others it becomes very difficult to argue with anything other than what each of us have experienced. You have not given a single scientific argument to support your opinion, in fact as I read through the posts you have not given a single argument to support your opinion at all anecdotal or otherwise. All you have done is attack other people without arguing your own points. Your only contribution to this discussion is a series of replies that say "your dumb, im right, your wrong, try harder" I know you believe that women marry for stability, and security, BUT WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THIS TO BE TRUE???? Argue your point or stop making it over and over, and try not to attack someone elses opinion all the time, it makes you look less credible.

As much as I think the following will be boring as hell for everyone in this thread im leaving it just for you.

A scientific study;

The link:http://scienceinsociety.northwestern...nce-attraction

The conclusion: Ten days before a speed-dating event, participants completed a questionnaire about what they were looking for in a mate. The answers to these questions matched what we expected—women sought status more than men did, and men sought looks more than women did. Then, the participants attended a speed-dating event, and were asked to rate all twelve participants on attractiveness, good earning prospects, and overall romantic interest. We found that when it comes participants evaluating how they feel about real people (as opposed to hypothetical ideal partners), the differences in those preferences disappears. That is, women and men were equally inspired by good looks and equally inspired (AT A LESSER EXTENT) by earning prospects.

P.S. (again) the thread is called why im better than you, the entire thread is anecdotal, thats why it is here.

Now you can give your obligatory your dumb, im right, your wrong argument, that seems to be working so well for you.

lucky i'm sane after all i've been through...(everbody say i'm cool......he's cool)
i can't complain but sometimes i still do
life's been good to me so farrrrrrrrrrrr...

Greatest guitar player on the planet! I want a helemt cam for my bed.

[teatotal]

im better than you lot cause im not silly enough to read posts with more than 6 sentences ...sure you made a good point about whatever you were talking about tho bum :P

[bum783]

I made a very good point..it was Joe Walsh is the greatest guitar player on the planet

[rasterbee]

bum, you're new to this, I understand. I don't care what happened to you personally in your life. You are no one. Your anecdotes mean nothing and carry no weight, just like mine. I know exactly what anecdote means and use it properly.

And again, I'm not reading all your crap. You're attacking how I'm arguing, and you're mistaken. I don't need to argue anything when nothing you say has anything to do with the world outside your own head.

EDIT: Ok, to be fair I did go reread your entire post and speed dating is nothing more than first impressions. Of course attractive people win first impressions, the results of that study do not prove what you think they prove. We're talking long term here, not a passing in the streets instant analysis of someone. If you go reread what I originally said, you'll realize you are arguing against a point I did not make. The reason I'm really good at putting people on tilt and winning arguments is because I'm really good at putting people on tilt and making them argue against nonexistent points. Somewhere you picked up that I said women don't value physical appearance when judging someone. I said women marry for stability.

EDIT2: And just to be a little more helpful...if you're going to use bold and capitals and different colors and underline and shizzits....

START A NEW PARAGRAPH, IT IS HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.

Don't just RANDOMLY STICK STUFF WHEREVER IN THE MIDDLE AND AT THE END OF PARAGRAPHS, it looks silly.

[teatotal]

well with a thread called "I am better than you" i think the only natural thing that would happen on it is an argument and its happened wonder if theres any way out of this cycle that doesnt involve not commenting on the thread ....

[annagilbert]

hum something like: i am not better then anyone i am just different then others and do things better then most?

[bum783]

Of course attractive people win first impressions, the results of that study do not prove what you think they prove. We're talking long term here, not a passing in the streets instant analysis of someone. If you go reread what I originally said, you'll realize you are arguing against a point I did not make. Somewhere you picked up that I said women don't value physical appearance when judging someone. I said women marry for stability.

Had your entire post been this it would have been perfect. You do not need to attack or belittle people to make a point.

I considerd not posting the study because of the reasons you stated, but it was still an interesting article. Im not above admitting that your final thoughts pretty much whoop me. You were refering specifically to the notion of marriage, and not initial attraction. As I think about it, I have to agree with you, women may initially be more attracted to the qualities sickbydefinition posted, but ultimately security and stability could be top factors in deciding to take a relationship to the level of marriage.

I thought about responding to your other comments, but in an effort to end this debate/argument I decided I would just focus on the part of your post that was logical, and not offensive. I would love to see your next post be a little more light hearted.

Now maybe we can get this thread back on track. In the spirit of good humour I want to re-start the thread with....


Im better than you because your dumb, im right, your wrong, try harder
LOL

[annagilbert]

well atleast i tried

[rasterbee]

bum....

That's lame.

[Balaam]

normally, i just stop in and make some glib comment, especially when the thread in OT is as inane as this one... let's all face it, the OP states he's better because of his fancy car, fancy clothes & powdered chocolate beverage

so i posted a couple of times here
quoting from an old song by an old rocker where he pokes fun at himself and the fact that even though he's got it made... he still has troubles

so i have come back to this thread to say just one more thing

instead of trying to point out how much better each of you think you are at whatever you think you're better at, why not try to think about how lucky you are to be in a position where you actually feel like you can rank yourself above others?

and now back to our regularly scheduled program...
all you want is~ what you can't have
and if you just look around man, you see you got magic~
so just sit back relax, enjoy it while you still have it~
don't look back on life man and only see tragic
because you could be better than that...

YUP YUP