Page 18 of 22 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 ... LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 212

Thread: Atlantis Record Broken!

  1. #171
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    evony.com
    Posts
    222

    Default

    it looks like na50 is a loaded servers. there are the usual hh hunters.. justice,mk(the king),rajpoot(endgame). and some smaller ones. Then the actual players who play.. the 1066 alliance led by skully took a 16 on na45. i'm sure it's not 100% the same but i think role players are the same. then the alliance softer had Atlantis on na32? i am not sure so don't quote me. then there is some Draco from na46 I think... they are coiners even though they are not to good. Ares is led by agonath who is a good player and the alliance seems good. The alliance 100 has some top rank players including CG, ispy and some others.i think it will be were the top alliance who ends up with Atlantis. u can't be sure anymore but 786 will not get Atlantis for sure. if not 100 then the alliance softer.
    No Current alliance or server

  2. Default

    tbh no1 will cap 0,0 with as many coiners there are. They will just hit the players going after 0,0 when they got waves out fking it all up. It often happens with big time coining servers like na50

    I am the gates of Hell
    Send everything you have at me, and I will not crack
    For when your time comes, I will unleash Hell on you
    With Lucifer my leader
    And drag you to Hell with me, For an eternity.

    Na45 - Destroyer - 7 Na51 - Avatar - 187 na52 - Destroyer - 187(host)

  3. #173
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Look out the window
    Posts
    759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Disturbed Inside View Post
    tbh no1 will cap 0,0 with as many coiners there are. They will just hit the players going after 0,0 when they got waves out fking it all up. It often happens with big time coining servers like na50
    if its a good alliance no one will know they are sending waves to cap it as they can camptime their waves to hit it w/o porting in

    Na47 - PoTaToHeAdbest - 7
    Na50 - SKORPIAN - 427
    Na55 - Potatoes - 7

    Retired from All Servers

  4. #174
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    evony.com
    Posts
    222

    Default

    true i agree with both but look at na49 massacre was #1 by far and they could never cap it.
    No Current alliance or server

  5. #175
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Look out the window
    Posts
    759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XFARMX View Post
    true i agree with both but look at na49 massacre was #1 by far and they could never cap it.
    Bad management so and bad team work

    Na47 - PoTaToHeAdbest - 7
    Na50 - SKORPIAN - 427
    Na55 - Potatoes - 7

    Retired from All Servers

  6. #176
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    evony.com
    Posts
    222

    Default

    i don't play na50.... it says u do so u could tell me... does 786 have good leadership? it's not rhetorical question. But honestly i like 100 for the win
    No Current alliance or server

  7. #177
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    415

    Default

    Maybe I'm naive, but I really don't see why people rush to get Atlantis, it's pretty useless unless you have infinite Thunder Raids or people you're gonna hit are offline for a long time(not sure why you'd waste your time on those players though, more use to kill the active ones) and at the beginning of the server, people have **** all in troops to draft lol... is it really worth it?

    Other point is, you then have to waste your troops defending something that has little use unless you're one of those loser alliances that sits and closes gates and comforts to keep it and only opens when it suits then(when very little attacks are actually coming, or you know for sure you'll beat them), in which case, why bother taking it, it just ruins it for the people who would take it and actually keep gates open(in my opinion, Atlantis shouldn't even have a button to close or open gates, should always be forced open).
    [Retired]
    Signature by: Morgan le Fay

    Shawne Sucks

  8. #178
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Look out the window
    Posts
    759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XFARMX View Post
    i don't play na50.... it says u do so u could tell me... does 786 have good leadership? it's not rhetorical question. But honestly i like 100 for the win
    I honestly don't know as I don't know who the leadership is in there

    Na47 - PoTaToHeAdbest - 7
    Na50 - SKORPIAN - 427
    Na55 - Potatoes - 7

    Retired from All Servers

  9. #179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Na1 View Post
    Maybe I'm naive, but I really don't see why people rush to get Atlantis, it's pretty useless unless you have infinite Thunder Raids or people you're gonna hit are offline for a long time(not sure why you'd waste your time on those players though, more use to kill the active ones) and at the beginning of the server, people have **** all in troops to draft lol... is it really worth it?

    Other point is, you then have to waste your troops defending something that has little use unless you're one of those loser alliances that sits and closes gates and comforts to keep it and only opens when it suits then(when very little attacks are actually coming, or you know for sure you'll beat them), in which case, why bother taking it, it just ruins it for the people who would take it and actually keep gates open(in my opinion, Atlantis shouldn't even have a button to close or open gates, should always be forced open).
    i would have to agree that you are a little naive, obviously the point is to prevent other alliances getting it. the small troopcounts you speak of do not remain small for long.
    Quote Originally Posted by cushseth View Post
    I'm taking it so hard, so so hard.
    NA43: Relapse
    NA33: INSOMNIA (retired)

  10. #180
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    415

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anja View Post
    i would have to agree that you are a little naive, obviously the point is to prevent other alliances getting it. the small troopcounts you speak of do not remain small for long.
    Who cares if they have it lol... it's useless
    [Retired]
    Signature by: Morgan le Fay

    Shawne Sucks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •