Jesus christ guys, all three of you wrote friggin' essays while I was gone.
Jesus christ guys, all three of you wrote friggin' essays while I was gone.
In WAR, one must decide their faith, or others will decide yours.
Think you can read it without laughing? Go ahead and try it http://bbs.evony.com/showthread.php?...19#post1810519
Since we are currently discussing the possibility of alien existing, I thought I would add this into the conversation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7c9Z...eature=related
A summary of this video.
It is supposed to be a soft tissue fossilized many many years ago.
However, the supposed fossil is not a complete form, so a mirror is used to make an identical hemisphere, forming what they now claim as a facial structure of supposed alien creatures. According to this, they have collected many type of species of alien fossil.
I am not buying this, but it warrant my curiosity.
I am confident with he intellectual level of this forums, i would read a very different opinion from mind and could shed some light into this new supposed claim of discovery.
The mirror method was also use on the mars supposed face.
If they put the mirror on 1 side to create an identical hemisphere, the face resembles an ape, if the mirror was move to the other side, it was supposed to look like a lion.
TO ME, THIS IS JUST AN ILLUSION.
After carefully reviewing more of this independent person's supposed discovery. The more I realize he is a looney =)
There seems to be a flood of this type.
It is entertaining to say the least, despite it being a hoax.
Last edited by deadlysage; 12-08-2011 at 08:36 PM.
In WAR, one must decide their faith, or others will decide yours.
Think you can read it without laughing? Go ahead and try it http://bbs.evony.com/showthread.php?...19#post1810519
Someone red rep GreyWind for me for quoting the entire freaking first post to only say one inane, non-comedic thing please.
No idea ?? You must be joking
8 years of Univ. I have a very good idea actually. Go read some books.
Special Theory of Relat, then General Theory, and Quantum. Thats d basic 2 years. And Im NOT joking.
A proof of this is that particles such as mesons survive 'long' trips when they should have disintegrated coz its longer than their lifetime. But they DO arrive, confirmng that even people travelling at high speeds can reach long distances in shorter times. Of course if they try cming back , they see Earth Very old. Remember the twins paradox ??
Michio Kaku is good too for reading![]()
Last edited by Alusair; 12-09-2011 at 11:14 PM. Reason: double post
Special Theory of Relativity. General Theory. Quantum Theory. What do all three of these have in common? Theory. Theory is not definite fact. Wormholes are not proven to exist. We've never ridden black holes like ocean waves, or whatever you were suggesting earlier. If we're going to use unproven possibilities as definite methods of practical space travel, then we may as well simply use quantum teleportation and save the effort of actually traveling at all.
It's all Rodri's fault.
My friend. Those are some of the most basic laws since the 1920s. They are proven, nobel prizes awarded, atomic bombs and accelerators built. And I repeat partof the undergrad curriculum. The describe x rays we see from neutron stars slowing atomic clocks microelectronics using quantum tunnelling..,
.
If they're laws, why are they still called theories? And if wormholes do exist, can you show me official documentation of discovered ones in our universe, and perhaps documentation of them indeed being used to transport objects over a large distance? After all, if they're proven laws and not just theories, there should be field data to back this.
Also, if things like the Theory of Everything are the most basic of scientific laws (despite not yet being exactly defined), what's the more advanced laws?
It's all Rodri's fault.
Bookmarks