Lolol success and Vietnam in the same sentence LOL.
Lolol success and Vietnam in the same sentence LOL.
Snuggles-154
Actually there was success, CIA and DIA records prove that. What failed was the Vietmanization of the South's Army. Because of the foibles of language translation, the South could not totally comprehend the tech manuals of the equipment, vis a vis the huey gunship, as the most prominent case, translation into the Vietmanese language. Also, if you give cause to study, when the US pulled out, it left with an agreement to pay back the north for bomb damage, that debt was never paid, it also left with the promise to go back should any hostilities re-arise. The Mayaquez incident should of prompted the US back into the fray, however Prez Ford, declined to engage. Broken promises becomes cowards. just saying. so again we have a loose mind, who needs to go back and study history, before making statements that make them look ... silly, as if they know not what it is they speak of.
Pleiku, Kontum, and Dak To where the actual NVA had massive tunnel bases. Bloody Bloody Bloody. If you ever git the chance ... um ... thank your dad for me.
Last edited by SickbyDefinition; 04-20-2012 at 11:37 PM.
HCs-14
"Any alliance whose purpose is not the intention to wage war is senseless and useless."
-Adolf Hitler
Incorrect , The U.S Only intervened after NK took back SK , they purposely stayed back until then due to the U.S's policy to sit back until communism threatened to spread , Although China did have part of NK's fightback this was only because SK ventured into China , And the US , only intervened when NK took SK because of the spread of communism. Also it wasn't nearly the end SK indefinitely went towards and into China , which was ultimately their downfall.
NK to SK first.. then US intervened and took most of SK back and NK, but then China felt threatened and intervened on NK's behalf, causing the never ending war and forcing the war to end in an armistice.
In a nutshell
HCs-14
"Any alliance whose purpose is not the intention to wage war is senseless and useless."
-Adolf Hitler
Japengo
I could not stop laughing........
These wars have been fought before (except a couple)
but with modern technology and weapons, who would win now?
Germany VS France (France has the bigger army and the nuclear power due to Germany's army limits, Germany has the bigger economy and more capability to build nukes)
Germany by far due to the fact France has fallen since the napoleonic age and dont have a huge military presence now.
USA VS China (without nuclear bombs)
USA they have the best everything and are most tactical
China VS Russia (nuclear bombs in)
Russia china has many people but many are incompitant no offence to chinese but that is why jobs are cheap there
USA VS Russia (no nuclear bombs)
South Korea VS North Korea
North Korea because everyone would butt in
Spain VS Mexico
Spain the instablility due to the drug cartels ruins the National army there
Japan VS South Korea
Japan they are much like the U.S and South Korea has its northern enimies to deal with
Israel VS Egypt
Israel they have one of the greatest airforces and armies in the world
Britain VS India
Britain india is very religous are many are pacifist
Switzerland VS Belgium (if that happened)
Belgium they manufacture some of the best weapons in the world
Pakistan VS India
Would be more of a terrorist attack than a war
Turkey VS Iran
Iran due to the fact that Turkey isnt very strong militarily
Last edited by Alzar; 03-30-2012 at 08:46 PM.
Bookmarks