Page 9 of 12 FirstFirst ... 7891011 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 111

Thread: Modern War: Who would win?

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Living in StoneD with TipsyPixie. thats right be jealous
    Posts
    77

    Default

    Lolol success and Vietnam in the same sentence LOL.
    Snuggles-154

  2. #82
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    En route vers les étoiles.
    Posts
    2,611

    Default

    Actually there was success, CIA and DIA records prove that. What failed was the Vietmanization of the South's Army. Because of the foibles of language translation, the South could not totally comprehend the tech manuals of the equipment, vis a vis the huey gunship, as the most prominent case, translation into the Vietmanese language. Also, if you give cause to study, when the US pulled out, it left with an agreement to pay back the north for bomb damage, that debt was never paid, it also left with the promise to go back should any hostilities re-arise. The Mayaquez incident should of prompted the US back into the fray, however Prez Ford, declined to engage. Broken promises becomes cowards. just saying. so again we have a loose mind, who needs to go back and study history, before making statements that make them look ... silly, as if they know not what it is they speak of.
    Dog of War grrrrr

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Building a religion... a limited edition...
    Posts
    15,996

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by King Alboin View Post
    Oh so true, that!!! Acer Oh so true^

    Operation ArchLight was helluva a success till pulled, gave a pause for the enemy to re-group, re-form and re-deploy.

    Hell I need to buy you a beer. a real beer
    My dad was deployed in the central highlands in Pleiku, Kontum, and Dak To in 68 to 69, just on the cusp of the Tet, so I tend to read and watch a lot about Vietnam.... which in-turn made me start reading/watching about other wars.

  4. #84
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    En route vers les étoiles.
    Posts
    2,611

    Default

    Pleiku, Kontum, and Dak To where the actual NVA had massive tunnel bases. Bloody Bloody Bloody. If you ever git the chance ... um ... thank your dad for me.
    Dog of War grrrrr

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    In the Secret World of Arrietty
    Posts
    529

    Default

    I need to serve the conscription soon for the Army lol... cheers :P

    Quote Originally Posted by lordgonzo View Post
    In June 1950 , South Korea surprised North Korea and advanced upwards , and into China , North Korea , simply said screw this , flipped the way the whole war was going , North Korea had one main city left , but still managed to take the whole peninsula , Until the U.S intervened and put the peninsula back to where it started.

    Thus , South Korea had North Korea in the palm of it's hands , but just with a simple mindset change , North Korea annialated the South , and without the help of the US there would be no South and North Korea.

    Elaborating on Acer's post.

    Someone fix double posting TY.

    Wait when US joined SK, they pushed the border to nearly the end. Sure SK/US had them in their palms, and the lands would be the democratic SK if CHINA hadnt intervened.
    Last edited by SickbyDefinition; 04-20-2012 at 11:37 PM.
    HCs-14

    "Any alliance whose purpose is not the intention to wage war is senseless and useless."

    -Adolf Hitler

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SAXONY 4life xD
    Posts
    1,265

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrHyde View Post
    Someone fix double posting TY.

    Wait when US joined SK, they pushed the border to nearly the end. Sure SK/US had them in their palms, and the lands would be the democratic SK if CHINA hadnt intervened.
    Incorrect , The U.S Only intervened after NK took back SK , they purposely stayed back until then due to the U.S's policy to sit back until communism threatened to spread , Although China did have part of NK's fightback this was only because SK ventured into China , And the US , only intervened when NK took SK because of the spread of communism. Also it wasn't nearly the end SK indefinitely went towards and into China , which was ultimately their downfall.

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    In the Secret World of Arrietty
    Posts
    529

    Default

    NK to SK first.. then US intervened and took most of SK back and NK, but then China felt threatened and intervened on NK's behalf, causing the never ending war and forcing the war to end in an armistice.

    In a nutshell
    HCs-14

    "Any alliance whose purpose is not the intention to wage war is senseless and useless."

    -Adolf Hitler

  8. #88

    Default

    Japengo
    I could not stop laughing........

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lovin life
    Posts
    2,250

    Default

    These wars have been fought before (except a couple)

    but with modern technology and weapons, who would win now?


    Germany VS France (France has the bigger army and the nuclear power due to Germany's army limits, Germany has the bigger economy and more capability to build nukes)
    Germany by far due to the fact France has fallen since the napoleonic age and dont have a huge military presence now.

    USA VS China (without nuclear bombs)
    USA they have the best everything and are most tactical

    China VS Russia (nuclear bombs in)
    Russia china has many people but many are incompitant no offence to chinese but that is why jobs are cheap there
    USA VS Russia (no nuclear bombs)

    South Korea VS North Korea
    North Korea because everyone would butt in

    Spain VS Mexico
    Spain the instablility due to the drug cartels ruins the National army there

    Japan VS South Korea
    Japan they are much like the U.S and South Korea has its northern enimies to deal with

    Israel VS Egypt
    Israel they have one of the greatest airforces and armies in the world

    Britain VS India
    Britain india is very religous are many are pacifist

    Switzerland VS Belgium (if that happened)
    Belgium they manufacture some of the best weapons in the world

    Pakistan VS India
    Would be more of a terrorist attack than a war

    Turkey VS Iran
    Iran due to the fact that Turkey isnt very strong militarily
    Last edited by Alzar; 03-30-2012 at 08:46 PM.

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    In the Secret World of Arrietty
    Posts
    529

    Default

    Oh my goodness, so many facts wrong...

    Quote Originally Posted by Alzar View Post
    These wars have been fought before (except a couple)

    but with modern technology and weapons, who would win now?


    Germany VS France (France has the bigger army and the nuclear power due to Germany's army limits, Germany has the bigger economy and more capability to build nukes)
    Germany by far due to the fact France has fallen since the napoleonic age and dont have a huge military presence now.

    France is still a top 10 army, one of the countries allowed to have Nukes as well as being in the Security Council. and yes, they have a pretty good presence in terms of military.


    USA VS China (without nuclear bombs)
    USA they have the best everything and are most tactical

    Nationalism right there.

    China VS Russia (nuclear bombs in)
    Russia china has many people but many are incompitant no offence to chinese but that is why jobs are cheap there

    I wish you could do some research about the Chinese military.

    USA VS Russia (no nuclear bombs)

    NO answer there for you for some reason

    South Korea VS North Korea
    North Korea because everyone would butt in

    If your US could truly beat anyone EASILY, even if China did butt in, it would last less than a month right? (SK victory that you are implying)

    Spain VS Mexico
    Spain the instablility due to the drug cartels ruins the National army there

    Japan VS South Korea
    Japan they are much like the U.S and South Korea has its northern enimies to deal with

    Except the Japanese have limits on how much they can build, a lot of people would put SK ahead of the Japanese.

    Israel VS Egypt
    Israel they ahve one of the greatest airforces and armies in the world

    Britain VS India
    Britain india is very religous are many are pacifist

    Huh? Do some research on the Indian military...

    Switzerland VS Belgium (if that happened)
    Belgium they manufacture some of the best weapons in the world

    Im not gonna comment, but my pick would be the Swiss for various reasons.

    Pakistan VS India
    Would be more of a terrorist attack than a war

    ...No answer

    Turkey VS Iran
    Iran due to the fact that Turkey isnt very strong militarily
    Wait what? Turkey is a top 15 military for sure.... what's your definition of strong?
    HCs-14

    "Any alliance whose purpose is not the intention to wage war is senseless and useless."

    -Adolf Hitler

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •