Keep the thread on topic guys, it's not a discussion about spam, it's a discussion about luuuvvvv. <3
Keep the thread on topic guys, it's not a discussion about spam, it's a discussion about luuuvvvv. <3
The wheels of survival are greased more readily by easy lies than hard truths.
lolol This makes me laugh every time I see it, all this proof does is state that girls make men even more evil, and by definition this means that without girls men are unevil. Why?
Consider that the relation between Evil and Girls is dependent on time and money, while the Relation between Evil and Boys is dependent on the assumption that girls themselves are in fact evil and the exact same qualities that women are dependent on.
Since we are comparing boys and girls on a 1:1 scale we can set Boy=Boys and Girl=Girls
So consider this:
Boy=(time)(money)(girl)(sex)
We know that Girl = (time)(money) and that Girl = sex
So
Boy = (Girl)(Girl)(Girl)
Boy = (Girl)^3
So 1 Boy is the equivalent of 3 girls
I ranted about what a stupid proof it was and proceeded to prove that it was true ... What do you think?
I hate Math
GO DEBATE
By Morgan Le Fay
Oh dear. Am I the only one a bit confused here?
......"Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand.” ......Credits to ChuckNoris for the awesome siggy and avi !
No
i am to
![]()
By Morgan Le Fay
its quite simple, see
there is a formula that states that girls equal evil, however, stated posthumously, there is another formula stating that guys equal evil.
as like anti-matter and regular ole matter, when they touch ... one cancels out the other and so explosions occur
to draw a picture, it is best to google the formula, proscribed by Thalin ...
of to which, I have done and found this simple equation ...
so you can see that luv is actually mathmatical, and guys are not evil, as such girls are not evil ... crazy idea that ..
for would you not agree that 1+1= propitiation of the species?
notwithstanding, trouble does and will always rear its deformed head, however, given the fact that there are 7 BILLION people on this planet, something must of gone right, or well, there would be no one. 1+1= nadda, zip, uh uh.
Love, well, who is to say wtf it really is anyhoo'sits? Hmmmm? is it chemical, mathmatical, retrospectual, conceptual, illusional, redirectible, conclusional, final, retrievable, irretrivable, palatable, two tableable, non-attainable, attainable, factual, irrepressable, deniable, undeniable, wtfable, or just plain disheartening. My guess is its bunk. Love can be true, but lovers have trouble being true. they should make a glue to piece back together broken hearts. well beer helps, vodka cures, tequilla tranquilizes, a new love can infermiate, but its not quite the same, noa is it? Me? I always tend for a new love, with a pitcher of beer. works ever damn time. guarantee. Makes the "what was I thinking" into an after thought of "wow" {fill in the blank}.
Conclusional question? is love for suckers and fools? Lets hope so. My advise to all those who are thinking about loving a person who may be three points shy of perfect ... jump in, feet first, dont give them your money, or your favorite book, dont share toothbrushes, trust piddly, listen very closely to the words that proceed out of their lips, conjugate your verbs, show your math, keep a can opener handy, dont let them drive your car, say please, kiss them even when you are ****ed at them, speak what is on your mind, not what is between your thoughts, remember: praise or complaint, either or, you get more of it, dont waste a gift, and dont give waste, give them time alone to think and fart, so you dont smell them stink, which is very smart, and above all else, remember this, you aint nobody till you have somebody to keep you warm at night when all the spookies come out to play. For it aint always about the sex, mostly its about that hand on your butt cheek, letting you know, all is well.
thought so, nuff said, I'm done, I'm gone. aint gonna be no laters.
Last edited by King Alboin; 02-15-2012 at 02:19 AM.
Bookmarks