Results 1 to 10 of 108

Thread: Age 2 .v. Age 1!

Threaded View

  1. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eartha View Post
    Have to say Age 1 and I have played both. HH just don't cut it next to the insta att and pol heros. Wall defs can be changed instantly depending on what is being sent at you. Insta troops can be stacked in racks, no need to feed and your enemy hasn't a clue they are there. Plus, the only limit on the amount of these hero's you can hold is you working the backsides off them and how many lv10 FH you hold.
    Yeah, that is the edge an Age 1 player has for sure. In a toe to toe fight we'd win every time, bring strategems into it though, which surely they would and an Age 1 player is a total noob again against very effective weapons.
    I remember when I sent at Atlantis with my alliance and in the mail with times I got, remember to truce at the bottom. It was plainly written, it had been repeated. TRUCE AFTER SENDING. Being the badarse Age 1 guy I am, I wanted to keep farming. I've never felt like such a noob in gaming ever with what happened. Now, Age 1 players would be shrugging right now going so what? Age 2 players would be giggling. They're a tricky bunch with some tricky items. The point is though, unless you are a super spender, you won't stop me once I finally get traction. My heroes aren't traceable, you can't buy a mirror for them. They could be anywhere, they don't have a finite source of energy - I think :P
    Some would rise and many would fall, but I think it would be an Age 1 player that would come out on top. I just think that Age 1 players have a better sense of battle mechanics and have the bonus of not having to rely on items to dominate an opponent.
    Last edited by Elfkey; 07-03-2012 at 04:31 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •