Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 108

Thread: Age 2 .v. Age 1!

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Stockpiling My Twinkies
    Posts
    369

    Default

    Age 2 is easier to play in my opinion. Less farming and more killing >
    EPIC XMas present from Don Ezio

    PM me if you need a sig


  2. #82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eartha View Post
    Have to say Age 1 and I have played both. HH just don't cut it next to the insta att and pol heros. Wall defs can be changed instantly depending on what is being sent at you. Insta troops can be stacked in racks, no need to feed and your enemy hasn't a clue they are there. Plus, the only limit on the amount of these hero's you can hold is you working the backsides off them and how many lv10 FH you hold.
    Yeah, that is the edge an Age 1 player has for sure. In a toe to toe fight we'd win every time, bring strategems into it though, which surely they would and an Age 1 player is a total noob again against very effective weapons.
    I remember when I sent at Atlantis with my alliance and in the mail with times I got, remember to truce at the bottom. It was plainly written, it had been repeated. TRUCE AFTER SENDING. Being the badarse Age 1 guy I am, I wanted to keep farming. I've never felt like such a noob in gaming ever with what happened. Now, Age 1 players would be shrugging right now going so what? Age 2 players would be giggling. They're a tricky bunch with some tricky items. The point is though, unless you are a super spender, you won't stop me once I finally get traction. My heroes aren't traceable, you can't buy a mirror for them. They could be anywhere, they don't have a finite source of energy - I think :P
    Some would rise and many would fall, but I think it would be an Age 1 player that would come out on top. I just think that Age 1 players have a better sense of battle mechanics and have the bonus of not having to rely on items to dominate an opponent.
    Last edited by Elfkey; 07-03-2012 at 04:31 AM.

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Oh! Muligan!
    Posts
    450

    Default

    Age 2, cuz age 1 players would quit... cuz they wouldnt want to play with the age 2 game lol
    <23:17>[Class E]: this game could be awesome

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    my moms basement
    Posts
    125

    Default

    i'm a core age 2 player but have tried age 1 and whithin the 1st month i could build 100k cavs in a week with 2 cities which is amazing but short and simple i think age 2 because of leadership on heroes,HC drafting and star sets

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Waiting for cushseth to rep me.
    Posts
    1,857

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elfkey View Post
    Yeah, that is the edge an Age 1 player has for sure. In a toe to toe fight we'd win every time, bring strategems into it though, which surely they would and an Age 1 player is a total noob again against very effective weapons.
    I remember when I sent at Atlantis with my alliance and in the mail with times I got, remember to truce at the bottom. It was plainly written, it had been repeated. TRUCE AFTER SENDING. Being the badarse Age 1 guy I am, I wanted to keep farming. I've never felt like such a noob in gaming ever with what happened. Now, Age 1 players would be shrugging right now going so what? Age 2 players would be giggling. They're a tricky bunch with some tricky items. The point is though, unless you are a super spender, you won't stop me once I finally get traction. My heroes aren't traceable, you can't buy a mirror for them. They could be anywhere, they don't have a finite source of energy - I think :P
    Some would rise and many would fall, but I think it would be an Age 1 player that would come out on top. I just think that Age 1 players have a better sense of battle mechanics and have the bonus of not having to rely on items to dominate an opponent.
    i see a lot of mention of stratagems and items by age 1 players stating this is our main advantage, they are not, in fact theyre useless in toe to toe battles really if your enemy is smart.

    it is the life bonuses that would defeat ye, you think a 2k attack hero is that effective against a hero with a 3.2% life bonus and if we wished an uprise buff adding 50% to the troops damage reduction?

    well i can tell you it is not. it is the starset bonuses and our lack of upkeep that are our main strength and would result in your demise late game

    early game im not sure, how fast does it take a decent age 1 player to get 100k archers up and running after server starts?


    Quote Originally Posted by cushseth View Post
    I don't care if your bad. But don't teach other people your badness.
    Quote Originally Posted by WiiTard View Post
    This little pony just remortgaged for more war ports.

  6. #86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tipperary1 View Post
    i see a lot of mention of stratagems and items by age 1 players stating this is our main advantage, they are not, in fact theyre useless in toe to toe battles really if your enemy is smart.

    it is the life bonuses that would defeat ye, you think a 2k attack hero is that effective against a hero with a 3.2% life bonus and if we wished an uprise buff adding 50% to the troops damage reduction?

    well i can tell you it is not. it is the starset bonuses and our lack of upkeep that are our main strength and would result in your demise late game

    early game im not sure, how fast does it take a decent age 1 player to get 100k archers up and running after server starts?
    I think strats play a big factor in 1 vs 1 battles in age 2 especially if your defending you could easily strat certain waves to land before the required time.. If the attacker has sent waves to clear the ponies followed by mech waves or hammers those waves could easily land before ( Entice enemy into compromising position) the pony clearing waves which could either lead the mechs to do less damage or the hammers would go splat.

    Also the besiege strats could easily send the waves back.. While I like age 2 better I believe the 1 vs 1 battles in age 2 favours the defender much higher than it would on age 1.

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    519

    Default

    I only like age 1 cause you don't gotta wait 30 mins to attack..

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    New Westminster
    Posts
    106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigNorr View Post
    Meh all about what you personally prefer I've never been able to get into AgeII so I have to say AgeI. I like the whole instant heroes and big warcities aspect and I actually like the fact that if you don't maintain your food your army dies so people can't just chill with closed gates.
    I gotta agree with that.
    drive your enemy into truce [ after you reduced the res load by plundering the cities ]
    then keep pounding them back into truce and plundering their res away.
    pound their alts into truce
    pound their entire alliance into truce.
    they lose cause they refugee their troops away.
    and you just sit there building up even more.

  9. #89

    Default

    if it takes u more than 3secs to think age1 your not hardcore
    If the French were really intelligent, they'd speak English
    Alls Fair In Love n War

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    in a thing named a house :P
    Posts
    563

    Default

    age 1 is better by miles
    !!your existence is to feed my army!!
    !S168- TrooperXD
    !W26- TrooperXD!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •