Age 2 is easier to play in my opinion. Less farming and more killing >![]()
Age 2 is easier to play in my opinion. Less farming and more killing >![]()
Yeah, that is the edge an Age 1 player has for sure. In a toe to toe fight we'd win every time, bring strategems into it though, which surely they would and an Age 1 player is a total noob again against very effective weapons.
I remember when I sent at Atlantis with my alliance and in the mail with times I got, remember to truce at the bottom. It was plainly written, it had been repeated. TRUCE AFTER SENDING. Being the badarse Age 1 guy I am, I wanted to keep farming. I've never felt like such a noob in gaming ever with what happened. Now, Age 1 players would be shrugging right now going so what? Age 2 players would be giggling. They're a tricky bunch with some tricky items. The point is though, unless you are a super spender, you won't stop me once I finally get traction. My heroes aren't traceable, you can't buy a mirror for them. They could be anywhere, they don't have a finite source of energy - I think :P
Some would rise and many would fall, but I think it would be an Age 1 player that would come out on top. I just think that Age 1 players have a better sense of battle mechanics and have the bonus of not having to rely on items to dominate an opponent.
Last edited by Elfkey; 07-03-2012 at 04:31 AM.
Age 2, cuz age 1 players would quit... cuz they wouldnt want to play with the age 2 game lol
<23:17>[Class E]: this game could be awesome
i'm a core age 2 player but have tried age 1 and whithin the 1st month i could build 100k cavs in a week with 2 cities which is amazing but short and simple i think age 2 because of leadership on heroes,HC drafting and star sets
i see a lot of mention of stratagems and items by age 1 players stating this is our main advantage, they are not, in fact theyre useless in toe to toe battles really if your enemy is smart.
it is the life bonuses that would defeat ye, you think a 2k attack hero is that effective against a hero with a 3.2% life bonus and if we wished an uprise buff adding 50% to the troops damage reduction?
well i can tell you it is not. it is the starset bonuses and our lack of upkeep that are our main strength and would result in your demise late game
early game im not sure, how fast does it take a decent age 1 player to get 100k archers up and running after server starts?
I think strats play a big factor in 1 vs 1 battles in age 2 especially if your defending you could easily strat certain waves to land before the required time.. If the attacker has sent waves to clear the ponies followed by mech waves or hammers those waves could easily land before ( Entice enemy into compromising position) the pony clearing waves which could either lead the mechs to do less damage or the hammers would go splat.
Also the besiege strats could easily send the waves back.. While I like age 2 better I believe the 1 vs 1 battles in age 2 favours the defender much higher than it would on age 1.
I only like age 1 cause you don't gotta wait 30 mins to attack..
I gotta agree with that.
drive your enemy into truce [ after you reduced the res load by plundering the cities ]
then keep pounding them back into truce and plundering their res away.
pound their alts into truce
pound their entire alliance into truce.
they lose cause they refugee their troops away.
and you just sit there building up even more.
if it takes u more than 3secs to think age1 your not hardcore![]()
If the French were really intelligent, they'd speak EnglishAlls Fair In Love n War
age 1 is better by miles
!!your existence is to feed my army!!!S168- TrooperXD!W26- TrooperXD!
Bookmarks