What if there are no open flats in a world for a zero'd player to reconnect with his city![]()
As I understand.
Some of the servers are seriously busy now
Warehouses are a must have item ?
What if there are no open flats in a world for a zero'd player to reconnect with his city![]()
As I understand.
Some of the servers are seriously busy now
Warehouses are a must have item ?
Last edited by Mackay131; 09-08-2012 at 03:42 PM. Reason: error then add comments
Best wishes to those who were in ICECOLD, MERC, HONOR on 131, SOLACE on 144, thePack2 on 158
What about the guys that hold a major gruge on someone, now they can just hunt down every city of that person and zero them all knowing that they can get what maybe a prime area, before it didnt matter how hard they tried, they couldnt get that "Prime" area. This is a major screw up on evony's part. Add it to the long list of stupid ideas I guess.
Answer is simple, never have anything you cannot protect, if you come across a player you cannot possibly beat then truce. If you are trying to steal their area or them being in the area is going to be a problem, LEAVE.
Try making a deal with them whatever, The so called 'Big' players most of the time are not after you, they usually have bigger fish to fry. Zeroed out or essentially ported away what the bleeding difference? If you are zeroed you ain't doing much anyway now are you.
No such thing as only one good area in the whole darned map.
And if a player wants to hunt down all your cities they have always had that option so your arguement makes no sense, the issue is the last city at 0 loyalty, guess what the days of one city accounts that are being used as spoilers are numbered, DEAL WITH IT.
this is the 1st time evony did something right, or preety hlarious if it is a huge hack. time to get rid of those stupid alts and inactives clogging up the farming area or let in reds to hit ha ha ha
Last edited by 157KILLER; 09-08-2012 at 04:35 PM.
Yup so tested it, $9 adv port wasted not cool
overall it is a good idea, but as implemented clearly the server-side code has bugs (in terms of determining if someone is 'inactive' or not) and needs to be fixed. People who are not inactive should not be getting booted.
Bookmarks