Page 30 of 40 FirstFirst ... 202829303132 ... LastLast
Results 291 to 300 of 395

Thread: Can capture last cities now!

  1. #291
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Check Album
    Posts
    1,175

    Default SLIGHT FLAW In PLAN

    What if there are no open flats in a world for a zero'd player to reconnect with his city

    As I understand.

    Some of the servers are seriously busy now

    Warehouses are a must have item ?
    Last edited by Mackay131; 09-08-2012 at 03:42 PM. Reason: error then add comments

    Best wishes to those who were in ICECOLD, MERC, HONOR on 131, SOLACE on 144, thePack2 on 158

  2. #292

    Default

    What about the guys that hold a major gruge on someone, now they can just hunt down every city of that person and zero them all knowing that they can get what maybe a prime area, before it didnt matter how hard they tried, they couldnt get that "Prime" area. This is a major screw up on evony's part. Add it to the long list of stupid ideas I guess.

  3. #293

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hickster View Post
    What about the guys that hold a major gruge on someone, now they can just hunt down every city of that person and zero them all knowing that they can get what maybe a prime area, before it didnt matter how hard they tried, they couldnt get that "Prime" area. This is a major screw up on evony's part. Add it to the long list of stupid ideas I guess.
    Answer is simple, never have anything you cannot protect, if you come across a player you cannot possibly beat then truce. If you are trying to steal their area or them being in the area is going to be a problem, LEAVE.

    Try making a deal with them whatever, The so called 'Big' players most of the time are not after you, they usually have bigger fish to fry. Zeroed out or essentially ported away what the bleeding difference? If you are zeroed you ain't doing much anyway now are you.

    No such thing as only one good area in the whole darned map.

    And if a player wants to hunt down all your cities they have always had that option so your arguement makes no sense, the issue is the last city at 0 loyalty, guess what the days of one city accounts that are being used as spoilers are numbered, DEAL WITH IT.

  4. #294

    Default Funny

    this is the 1st time evony did something right, or preety hlarious if it is a huge hack. time to get rid of those stupid alts and inactives clogging up the farming area or let in reds to hit ha ha ha
    Last edited by 157KILLER; 09-08-2012 at 04:35 PM.

  5. #295
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    LalaLand, where else?
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Yup so tested it, $9 adv port wasted not cool

  6. #296

    Default

    overall it is a good idea, but as implemented clearly the server-side code has bugs (in terms of determining if someone is 'inactive' or not) and needs to be fixed. People who are not inactive should not be getting booted.

  7. #297
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    432

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lalabee View Post
    Yup so tested it, $9 adv port wasted not cool

    You tested it. Don't cry about the outcome. You could have read this thread and found out what the outcome would be before you used the port.
    Vicious!
    S3/SS37

    Quote Originally Posted by cushseth View Post
    How dare you say something that makes sense on these forums. Bad girl, Bad!!!

  8. #298

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lalabee View Post
    Yup so tested it, $9 adv port wasted not cool
    Anyone who would spend money on an adv port is a moron.
    SS37

    Less QQ more PewPew

    Quote Originally Posted by Prodigy the 5 View Post
    cush has a point... and he is right
    Ya.

  9. #299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TentPig View Post
    overall it is a good idea, but as implemented clearly the server-side code has bugs (in terms of determining if someone is 'inactive' or not) and needs to be fixed. People who are not inactive should not be getting booted.
    exactly, right on

  10. #300

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TentPig View Post
    overall it is a good idea, but as implemented clearly the server-side code has bugs (in terms of determining if someone is 'inactive' or not) and needs to be fixed. People who are not inactive should not be getting booted.
    Ya.. but who cares.. They were clearly in a bad spot if they got zeroed. at least they get to move.
    SS37

    Less QQ more PewPew

    Quote Originally Posted by Prodigy the 5 View Post
    cush has a point... and he is right
    Ya.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •