Page 31 of 40 FirstFirst ... 212930313233 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 310 of 395

Thread: Can capture last cities now!

  1. #301
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Check Album
    Posts
    1,175

    Default

    http://evonyurl.com/vsxojd

    Leaves a flat - way cool

    √ http://imm.io/DFXY
    Last edited by Mackay131; 09-08-2012 at 05:51 PM. Reason: add pix

    Best wishes to those who were in ICECOLD, MERC, HONOR on 131, SOLACE on 144, thePack2 on 158

  2. #302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mackay131 View Post
    http://evonyurl.com/vsxojd

    Leaves a flat - way cool

    √ http://imm.io/DFXY
    Your really posting that to verify something we've been doing for 36 hours?
    SS37

    Less QQ more PewPew

    Quote Originally Posted by Prodigy the 5 View Post
    cush has a point... and he is right
    Ya.

  3. #303

    Default

    This for age 2?

  4. #304
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    1,269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eartha View Post
    It is happening to far too many people from what I know and hear about. Again, I shall repeat, the idea if it was working as Dave claims it should is fantastic. However, there is something very much amiss with it's execution, Evony need to step up and either a) fix it or b) admit it was always ment to be this way, instead of fobbing people off to the CS team.
    Fobbing? No. It's easy to make a claim, it's something else to submit a ticket. As has been explained many times before a ticket has to be made so we can track the issue, and have a history on it. Also, that's how we gauge when a problem is happening.

    If a player won't make a ticket, they probably aren't having a problem.

    I'm going to look into this issue with actives being removed from the map later.


    However, here's a question:
    Why should activity level matter? If someone has their last city zeroed, wouldn't a new location aid them in rebuilding and getting a respite from the constant attacks required to 0 someone?

    Why would they want to stay in their known location in order to get attacked more? I can imagine if it happened to me, I'd want to move to a new location for free to start over with my rebuilding.

    Flaming CHICKEN!
    Courtesy: Sturm

  5. #305

    Default

    Does it work for age 2 dave? Also if u get zeroed and your city drops to 0 and disapears when you come back are you starting from scratch in a new area or do u get your last city still in a new location?
    Na4 Vengence (VidiVici) - Retired
    Na43 3 (Troika) - Current


  6. #306
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    In Evony HQ, glitching the fixes
    Posts
    896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davemata View Post
    However, here's a question:
    Why should activity level matter? If someone has their last city zeroed, wouldn't a new location aid them in rebuilding and getting a respite from the constant attacks required to 0 someone?

    Why would they want to stay in their known location in order to get attacked more? I can imagine if it happened to me, I'd want to move to a new location for free to start over with my rebuilding.
    Kinda pointing out that you don't really play, here Dave

    On a new server, coiners are at a destructive level within the week, but people being destroyed aren't necessarily permanent neighbours. Even so, whilst a random re-drop elsewhere within the same state (thus keeping them within distance of their alliance mates) might be helpful... a completely random re-drop anywhere on the map leaves this noob account needing a teleport in order to get back to their alliance state.

    However, here's a question:
    Why shouldn't activity level matter? If Evony is officially stating (as have both you and Thantium) that ONLY inactives are being removed, then shouldn't that be the level of service provided?
    I don't believe in thinking before I speak
    I prefer to be just as surprised as everyone else by what I say

  7. #307
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    432

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davemata View Post
    Fobbing? No. It's easy to make a claim, it's something else to submit a ticket. As has been explained many times before a ticket has to be made so we can track the issue, and have a history on it. Also, that's how we gauge when a problem is happening.

    If a player won't make a ticket, they probably aren't having a problem.

    I'm going to look into this issue with actives being removed from the map later.


    However, here's a question:
    Why should activity level matter? If someone has their last city zeroed, wouldn't a new location aid them in rebuilding and getting a respite from the constant attacks required to 0 someone?

    Why would they want to stay in their known location in order to get attacked more? I can imagine if it happened to me, I'd want to move to a new location for free to start over with my rebuilding.


    Activity level doesn't matter. You lost. Start over.

    It is any 1 city account at 0 loy not just inactives. Which I am a-ok with anyway.
    Last edited by missirish; 09-09-2012 at 02:07 AM.
    Vicious!
    S3/SS37

    Quote Originally Posted by cushseth View Post
    How dare you say something that makes sense on these forums. Bad girl, Bad!!!

  8. #308

    Default

    I don't see the big deal. You are already being farmed to the point of being zeroed. You should be ecstatic you get to take your city and move it for free.
    SS37

    Less QQ more PewPew

    Quote Originally Posted by Prodigy the 5 View Post
    cush has a point... and he is right
    Ya.

  9. #309
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Check Album
    Posts
    1,175

    Default Yes

    Quote Originally Posted by cushseth View Post
    Your really posting that to verify something we've been doing for 36 hours?

    I was not aware of when this started,
    but this is certainly something to celebrate.

    Accounts with less than 100 prestige will be flagged inactive after 12 days with no login.
    Accounts with between 100 and 1000 prestige will be flagged inactive after 14 days with no login.
    Accounts with more than 1000 prestige are subject to being flagged inactive after 100 days with no login. We are not currently marking these accounts inactive, but we may do so in the future without further notice.
    In addition, accounts which have only one city, and that city has high grievance with 0 loyalty will be flagged as inactive after 40 days with no login.


    Source unknown but somewhere in the BBS as I recall
    Last edited by Mackay131; 09-09-2012 at 02:30 AM. Reason: Add inactive definition

    Best wishes to those who were in ICECOLD, MERC, HONOR on 131, SOLACE on 144, thePack2 on 158

  10. #310
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    432

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mackay131 View Post
    I was not aware of when this started,
    but this is certainly something to celebrate.

    Accounts with less than 100 prestige will be flagged inactive after 12 days with no login.
    Accounts with between 100 and 1000 prestige will be flagged inactive after 14 days with no login.
    Accounts with more than 1000 prestige are subject to being flagged inactive after 100 days with no login. We are not currently marking these accounts inactive, but we may do so in the future without further notice.
    In addition, accounts which have only one city, and that city has high grievance with 0 loyalty will be flagged as inactive after 40 days with no login.


    Source unknown but somewhere in the BBS as I recall

    Yea that was a post from 2009. They could have changed how they flag inactives long ago for all we know.
    Vicious!
    S3/SS37

    Quote Originally Posted by cushseth View Post
    How dare you say something that makes sense on these forums. Bad girl, Bad!!!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •