-
Inactive cities
Another very active player lost their last city last night and now is zeroed. Not being on for 5 or 6 hours is Not inactive in my book nor I think anyone with a modicum of common sense. It was a good idea in theory getting rid of real inactives but this is indiscriminate and unfair. Now the super botters are making hundreds more alt alliances to feed them and taking all the best farming places. In the past we could have at least had one city in our alliances home state and have a chance to rebuild but now you can wind up anywhere on the map and all that hard work building up npcs well that was a total waste of time.
I do not bot and fully expect to be placed on inactive rooster even though I log in daily, this is not fair. Oh, for the naysayers, none of the members who have quit only had 1 city, it is easy enough to cap cities when the other players who are heavy botters has 10s of millions of mechs, scouts, arch,trillions in resources etc I and other who do not bot have nowhere near that number of troops/resources. When I get zeroed I will quit like many others have quit this is an advantage only to people who bot or do not leave their computer for more than 5 hours. The players that have already quit spent money as I once did but I will not spend any more money as I can see where this is going. You should have sorted out the inactives on your own not incentivise more alt alliances being made and killing off real players.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks