Page 28 of 38 FirstFirst ... 182627282930 ... LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 372

Thread: Risen cost of Comfort.

  1. #271
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Waiting for cushseth to rep me.
    Posts
    1,857

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TentPig View Post
    So, if you're accepting the premise Evony is not willing to enforce their own TOS, and instead implement changes to deal with people who bot, why not simply bot yourself?

    After all, there's no downside to it now, is there, since Evony isn't enforcing their TOS?

    So, why not?

    (The above posting is a rhetorical question and not a solicitation/encouragement for anyone to bot, which would be a forum rules violation.)
    yea and thats the porblem, thats why bottings so prevalent, evony didnt nip the problem in the bud and now its too widespread to do anyhting about without seriously harming their revenue and customer base

    back when i first started hearing of bots, i also heard stories of players getting banned, accounts suspended etc. now i dont think ive heard of a player being banned for botting in id say a year.


    Quote Originally Posted by cushseth View Post
    I don't care if your bad. But don't teach other people your badness.
    Quote Originally Posted by WiiTard View Post
    This little pony just remortgaged for more war ports.

  2. #272
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Cracking my whip
    Posts
    3,473

    Default

    And there lies the problem to all this. If everyone followed the ToS changes would not be needed, the little fellas would get their fun and everyone would stop complaining.

    Truth is everyone wants their cupcake and eat it. Instead of saying Evony remove the botters/account sharers and multi accounted to encourage a balanced a fair game, instead we have pointless patches which hurt the most honest and not those who supposedly should be affected. Just because a few players feel they aren't getting their jollies.

    Of course botters have umpteen feeders which will help supply the comfort costs and a decrease in comforting to reduce the same costs. However, apparently this also fairyland to which I say fine, pretend to believe what you will, we all know it's about saving face more than supporting this change. Just please don't bother us again when the dreaded bots name it difficult to cap cities.

    Thanks to Infinitus for the epic B'day pressie!

  3. #273
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    floating around on a boat
    Posts
    1,409

    Default

    i have to say i having trouble adjusting to not praying after every time i lower my production to train troops lol my whole age2 life i been doing this and now i need to change my routine...lol

    YNWA

    RETIRED
    XxGamblexX aka RedEyeJedi
    S137 ~ SS54 ~ NA13 ~ NA21 ~ CA1

  4. #274
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Waiting for cushseth to rep me.
    Posts
    1,857

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gamble View Post
    i have to say i having trouble adjusting to not praying after every time i lower my production to train troops lol my whole age2 life i been doing this and now i need to change my routine...lol
    ive always adjusted tax rate lol


    Quote Originally Posted by cushseth View Post
    I don't care if your bad. But don't teach other people your badness.
    Quote Originally Posted by WiiTard View Post
    This little pony just remortgaged for more war ports.

  5. #275
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    thata way ====>
    Posts
    1,321

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TentPig View Post
    So, if you're accepting the premise Evony is not willing to enforce their own TOS, and instead implement changes to deal with people who bot, why not simply bot yourself?

    After all, there's no downside to it now, is there, since Evony isn't enforcing their TOS?

    So, why not?

    (The above posting is a rhetorical question and not a solicitation/encouragement for anyone to bot, which would be a forum rules violation.)
    if you have to cheat to win, there is no joy in victory
    (yes i know you're being sarcastic... maybe)

    @ MirsDej at least you know that it will have no effect on botting
    to be clear regarding the change, it was originally conceived by dave to combat botting
    the change was the dream of an evony rep
    'changing comforting will somehow fix the comforting bot problem'

    it will have no affect on the problem, it will only make it more difficult for legit players to exist.

    in the history of fails it's right up there with the alliance cooldown
    blessed are the geeks: for they shall inherit the earth


  6. #276

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balaam View Post
    if you have to cheat to win, there is no joy in victory
    (yes i know you're being sarcastic... maybe)
    Not really.

    If there are no consequences to breaking the law, then why have the law in the first place?


    My Age 2 alliance is now requiring all HC holders to have a minimum of 12 warehouses per HC to store comforting resources which cannot be plundered between attacks.

  7. #277
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    thata way ====>
    Posts
    1,321

    Default

    i guess stockpile 10 has a new reason to be achieved, other than clearing your tech quests and increasing your capacity a tiny bit
    blessed are the geeks: for they shall inherit the earth


  8. #278
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Waiting for cushseth to rep me.
    Posts
    1,857

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TentPig View Post
    Not really.

    If there are no consequences to breaking the law, then why have the law in the first place?


    My Age 2 alliance is now requiring all HC holders to have a minimum of 12 warehouses per HC to store comforting resources which cannot be plundered between attacks.
    lmfao

    speaks volumes about your alliance if thats true, you do realise that learning how to use your troops would be far more effective? ive been sieged many times for even weeks at a time having 100s of mil honour dropped on me and ive never been broken and had to comfort

    also with all those warehouses, youll suffer a major loss to troop production, which for me would be unacceptable


    Quote Originally Posted by cushseth View Post
    I don't care if your bad. But don't teach other people your badness.
    Quote Originally Posted by WiiTard View Post
    This little pony just remortgaged for more war ports.

  9. #279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tipperary1 View Post
    also with all those warehouses, youll suffer a major loss to troop production, which for me would be unacceptable
    What do they need many troops for when all they want is to click a button endlessly for defense?

    I say the comforting change is a step in the right direction, I argue facts and real ongoing situations of the matter...
    You dream up ideas that don't exist and STILL blame botters and STILL feel it's fair to have something forever in a war game...

  10. #280

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tipperary1 View Post
    lmfao

    speaks volumes about your alliance if thats true, you do realise that learning how to use your troops would be far more effective? ive been sieged many times for even weeks at a time having 100s of mil honour dropped on me and ive never been broken and had to comfort

    also with all those warehouses, youll suffer a major loss to troop production, which for me would be unacceptable
    All of our HCs are now configured as follows:



    As for troop production, that's what drafts are for!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •