Page 4 of 38 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 372

Thread: Risen cost of Comfort.

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    downunder
    Posts
    215

    Default

    theyre definatley going to loose the casual player (if they havent already) who spends sometimes. coin or limbo now seem to be the 2 ways of playing

    ps. lol, limbo is fun
    if i wanted to play age II i would be.

  2. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Karna View Post
    Just found a way to instantly raise 2 trillion food.
    Thank you, Evony

    http://prntscr.com/gajxu
    Is that not 2 billion?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    In a box near you...
    Posts
    77

    Default

    So this is like a legitimate add on to the game? Not just some bug they're gonna interupt our farming for later on today?

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thatcat View Post
    yeah alot of issues here.. not to mention if i have to comfort a few times this week while waiting on troops, then again next week is the comforting cost still high or does it go back to reasonable levels again?

    not to mention my comforting is higher already than a few allymates cuase ive capped a few cities to give away and didnt want to leave them sitting at 0 loyalty. might have to stop helping out the smaller players to save myself

    since evo dosent change things once theyve implemented them, theyll have to explain alot pretty fast!
    they did alter the 72 hr ban from rejoining alliance to 24hrs, im sure they will alter this to a much more reasonable amount to comfort your city since 99% of ppl will agree that this will make the game crap
    Last edited by CHRON1C; 09-27-2012 at 08:12 AM. Reason: typo

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    In a box near you...
    Posts
    77

    Default

    I mean really though...capping 10s and giving them to smaller alliance members is a part of the game, it helps boost the alliances strenght as a whole. How can we give cities to players that dont have the ressies to up loyalty? And in the long run, how can we save our own cities legitimately if the cost just keeps rising and rising and rising? Even 10m is an unreasonable amount. This really is a horrible feature to add to the game and will only hurt the little guys, once again giving advantage to the botters/big guys/coiners...who do they expect to benifit from this??

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Down South with no Gravy on Chips
    Posts
    258

    Default

    I think its great. I'm sick and tired of the bot comforting. This means I can cap cities again.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
    (")_(")signature to help him gain world domination.

  7. #37

    Default

    Pretty cool how all the advocates for the "little" guys come out whenever there is a push for a change thatd negatively effect bots. And without reading whatever the actual change entails.
    NA24: CELTS - Retired
    NA33: INSOMNIA - Retired
    NA43: Relapse

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Check Album
    Posts
    1,175

    Default Changed Price

    This will have a major impact on a high prestige player under attack
    Attached Images Attached Images

    Best wishes to those who were in ICECOLD, MERC, HONOR on 131, SOLACE on 144, thePack2 on 158

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    258

    Default

    yeap it's based on your prestige. I just went and looked and I'm on server 163.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    In a box near you...
    Posts
    77

    Default

    I've read a lot of it, I saw nothing about being related to prestige. But still, even then people are saying its charging them resources that are realistically unavailable in game...1.9 tril food?

    Quote Originally Posted by Blah99200 View Post
    Pretty cool how all the advocates for the "little" guys come out whenever there is a push for a change thatd negatively effect bots. And without reading whatever the actual change entails.
    Hehe yeah, it should be possible to cap Atlantis now, even if another player holds it Evenon the older servers, all those ST's gotta run out eventually. I'm only against this as far as it hurts the little guy, and this is only because I enjoy new players and teaching them aspects of the game. Its what got me addicted.
    Last edited by DaDracken; 09-27-2012 at 08:38 AM. Reason: Didnt wanna double post.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •