Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 53

Thread: NA1 ATLANTIS...The great warehouse defense

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    floating around on a boat
    Posts
    1,409

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by torxxx View Post
    oh but you haven't seen the scale of the assault, nor have you had to witness the anger/ frustration/ rage/ self-righteousness of the 150 or so accounts that are involved in the assault.

    seing that effort alone just makes one laugh, whether Hughesy stays forever or not in my opinion he's already done what he set out to do. . .

    i have seen the scale of the siege, just shows that the comforting prices need to be tweaked a little bit....take away the bots ability to comfort endlessly and people will stop using a bot to comfort defend.

    It is not an achievement to to have a bot defend a city indefinitely, and the sooner people here realize this the sooner everyone will stop crying about changes evony need to make in order to ensure a city can change hands.

    i still say make the cap limit on comforting limitless, every time you comfort the price goes up and up and up and up.............

    doing what this guy is doing is nothing to about....when he finally loses 00,00 i bet he quits the game because he can't handle not being able to have what he wants. boofrickerdyhoo!! just someone help him out when this happens and pass him a baby rattle so he does not wake up the neighbors.

    YNWA

    RETIRED
    XxGamblexX aka RedEyeJedi
    S137 ~ SS54 ~ NA13 ~ NA21 ~ CA1

  2. #22

    Default Why not

    Sure, I agree. Let's just keep changing the rules and mechanics of the game until it's no longer possible to hold an HC. As it stands, there is a slim chance to cap 0,0. If it ever is capped, there's no way on earth it will ever change hands again with 100 support cities stacked all around it. Nobody would be able to get within 50 miles of it. If that happens, can we request yet another rule change so we can cap it back please? Thanks.

    Middy

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Cracking my whip
    Posts
    3,473

    Default

    In that case, if we're going to change the comfort rules again so one side, maybe we can request that Evony only give attacking cities 1hr attacking time and a limit of the amount cities that can hold siege. lol

    Do you think that will improve the game?

    Thanks to Infinitus for the epic B'day pressie!

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    once upon a time there was a little girl named debbie who wanted to jump over the rainbow but she...
    Posts
    2,453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan le Fay View Post
    In that case, if we're going to change the comfort rules again so one side, maybe we can request that Evony only give attacking cities 1hr attacking time and a limit of the amount cities that can hold siege. lol

    Do you think that will improve the game?
    Nope. Worst idea ever.

    You don't attack much eh, do you Morgan?
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
    (")_(")signature to help him gain world domination



  5. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan le Fay View Post
    In that case, if we're going to change the comfort rules again so one side, maybe we can request that Evony only give attacking cities 1hr attacking time and a limit of the amount cities that can hold siege. lol

    Do you think that will improve the game?
    Lols, It takes 1h 12mins minimum to cap a city .

    Join ' Merge Servers on Evony ' in facebook
    http://bbs.evony.com/showthread.php?...ion+experience - battle mech.. nice guide for beginner's
    trying to become #1 joker on evony forums
    please help the BadManS joker Cause.. by clicking the REP button today ... lol

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Cracking my whip
    Posts
    3,473

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melri View Post
    Nope. Worst idea ever.

    You don't attack much eh, do you Morgan?
    Quote Originally Posted by BadManStor View Post
    Lols, It takes 1h 12mins minimum to cap a city .
    Methinks you failed to miss the irony there.

    Thanks to Infinitus for the epic B'day pressie!

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    floating around on a boat
    Posts
    1,409

    Default

    have you even looked at the area around Atlantis on NA1 ......? Dave mata has already said that the last comfort patch could be tweaked as far as the cost is concerned, that is not changing more game mechanics, its just slightly altering what is already in place. this person filling his city with warehouses and continuing the relentless comfort defense (sometimes bot assisted sometimes account share assisted) shows that it does need to be tweaked.

    why do you people have such a big problem with losing a city....? if it can be lost it can be re-taken.

    In this case the city in question is Atlantis, this is the one city in all of evony that should have 100's of millions of troops in it. if the people attacking it kill it off (normally meaning they probably used 5-10 times the troops to clear it than what was defending do you not think they deserve a chance to cap the city.....?

    Morgan.....you do not play age2, by your own admission you rarely play age1.... in age2 it would take many many months to build enough troops to attack a city that in age1 a person could build troops for in a day, after 6 months of troop building by lots and lots of players do you think its right for them to expel their troops in a few days clearing atlantis only to see that once it is cleared the defender can then just hold the city indefinitely because he is using comforting....???????? I did not miss the irony of your statement but its a really dumb one, there is a problem with capping cities so you suggest something that makes the problem worse..... I watched your opposition to this comfort change all along and apart from you saying that bots will evolve you really have no argument. in this case bots have not evolved, the player has, he evolved enough so he can still use his bot. but how many warehouses can you fit in a city....? the high level comfort price only needs to be raised to the point that filling every tile in your city still wont cover the cost of a comfort, at this point that tactic becomes obsolete and renders his bot useless.

    I still cant understand why you continue to kick up so much fuss about a game you rarely play. I can see why other people don't like the change.....its because they use the very tactic that evony are trying to wipe out.

    Anyway....go ahead and counter my argument, i really don't care, i wont respond, your getting like a broken record saying the same thing over and over.

    YNWA

    RETIRED
    XxGamblexX aka RedEyeJedi
    S137 ~ SS54 ~ NA13 ~ NA21 ~ CA1

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Cracking my whip
    Posts
    3,473

    Default

    If I'm allowed to can I point some irony and hypocrisy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gamble View Post
    i still say make the cap limit on comforting limitless, every time you comfort the price goes up and up and up and up.............

    doing what this guy is doing is nothing to about....when he finally loses 00,00 i bet he quits the game because he can't handle not being able to have what he wants. boofrickerdyhoo!! just someone help him out when this happens and pass him a baby rattle so he does not wake up the neighbors.
    I've underlined the most interesting statement. So if I understand this correctly it's ok for y'all to come here and create a thread whining on how it's impossible to capture this particular 0,0 and demand more 'tweaks' to make it easier to achieve your goal. However, if Hughesy was to lose Atlantis because there was another 'tweak' so it'll be impossible for him to hold it as defending against 100+ account, which would really take some doing, he'll have no right to cry about it.

    I think this statement from the feedback forum really sums it up.

    Quote Originally Posted by ATester
    I'm fairly sure that continually advocating changes made to the game so that one can more easily get what one wants is in and of itself an inability to handle not being able to have what one wants.
    Have a think about that.

    And while that's sinking in may I also point out that one of the reasons that frequently crop up to support the comfort changes is 'it's a war game'. Well correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that what's currently going on around Atlantis at the moment? I'm sure if Khans do manage to successfully capture 0,0, then a lot of the excitement will be removed from the game. Ever thought it could be partially why NA1 is still so active compared to many other Age 2 servers.
    Last edited by Morgan le Fay; 10-13-2012 at 08:03 AM.

    Thanks to Infinitus for the epic B'day pressie!

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Waiting for cushseth to rep me.
    Posts
    1,857

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan le Fay View Post
    If I'm allowed to can I point some irony and hypocrisy.



    I've underlined the most interesting statement. So if I understand this correctly it's ok for y'all to come here and create a thread whining on how it's impossible to capture this particular 0,0 and demand more 'tweaks' to make it easier to achieve your goal. However, if Hughesy was to lose Atlantis because there was another 'tweak' so it'll be impossible for him to hold it as defending against 100+ account, which would really take some doing, he'll have no right to cry about it.

    I think this statement from the feedback forum really sums it up.



    Have a think about that.

    And while that's sinking in may I also point out that one of the reasons that frequently crop up to support the comfort changes is 'it's a war game'. Well correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that what's currently going on around Atlantis at the moment? I'm sure if Khans do manage to successfully capture 0,0, then a lot of the excitement will be removed from the game. Ever thought it could be partially why NA1 is still so active compared to many other Age 2 servers.
    morgan if you wanted a ferrari and it costed 100k$ and you put in the hard work/overtime etc to pay for it and eventually bought it, did you not deserve that ferrari? so why if a person outs in the work to build up and clear an enemies city/account(decent defenders having an advantage) forcing them to the comfort game should they not get that city eventually since the person is defeated? if hughesy had to he could simply pass atlantis to someone else in his alliance with 100s of millions of troops and force khans to clear that too, make them burn all their troops, better way to stop them attacking than closing gates and hoping your bot doesnt fail.

    and i fail to see how whats going on at atlantis constitutes as war, the fighting stopped a long time ago. and as for atlantis being capped off hugh, his alliance should simply take it back, its not gonna be hard, the comforting changes now make that possible.


    Quote Originally Posted by cushseth View Post
    I don't care if your bad. But don't teach other people your badness.
    Quote Originally Posted by WiiTard View Post
    This little pony just remortgaged for more war ports.

  10. #30

    Default

    Every time I check the forums its the same old sob story.....
    Attached Images Attached Images

    I say the comforting change is a step in the right direction, I argue facts and real ongoing situations of the matter...
    You dream up ideas that don't exist and STILL blame botters and STILL feel it's fair to have something forever in a war game...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •