Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: 12 lvl 10 warehouses in atl on 47

  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TentPig View Post
    Just another example of how the whiners are going to complain about everything in the game that doesn't give them the ability to get whatever they want.

    Typical mentality of American society today.
    No we just want something done about endless comforting CHEATERS. I'm more then willing to do the work of killing all the troops and ri and waiting for a REASONABLE time to earn the prize. Just fix things so you can't cheat and comfort forever and its golden.

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordSauron View Post
    Here is the official response on account sharing and what is not permitted so there no confusion.
    Account Sharing
    ILLEGAL
    Multiple players all have each other's login information so that they can help each other defend, reinforce, farm and attack when the account holder is not online.
    Example: Andy, Angela, Ryan and Kelly all have each other's login information. When Kelly is attacked at night, Ryan logs in to her account to defend, and then logs in to Angela's account as well to reinforce Kelly. This is not allowed.
    the rule is against multiple people who each have individual accounts on the same server sharing their logins. i'm not talking about alliance mates sharing, i mean two people in the same physical location with only the 1 account between them. there isn't a rule against different people in one rl location using the same account and there couldn't be because it would be completely impossible to enforce because evony would have no way of knowing if a different person happened to be using the same computer, other than finding out where they live and becoming a peeping tom.

    also if you read a little closer i said it was the way you wrote it that made it sound like you were attacking 24/7 not that i thought you were actually doing it.

    so i guess i'd have to say YOU were wrong on both counts

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The9 View Post
    the rule is against multiple people who each have individual accounts on the same server sharing their logins. i'm not talking about alliance mates sharing, i mean two people in the same physical location with only the 1 account between them. there isn't a rule against different people in one rl location using the same account and there couldn't be because it would be completely impossible to enforce because evony would have no way of knowing if a different person happened to be using the same computer, other than finding out where they live and becoming a peeping tom.

    also if you read a little closer i said it was the way you wrote it that made it sound like you were attacking 24/7 not that i thought you were actually doing it.

    so i guess i'd have to say YOU were wrong on both counts
    Your reading comprehension needs some serious work.

    Account Sharing
    ILLEGAL
    Multiple players all have each other's login information so that they can help each other defend, reinforce, farm and attack when the account holder is not online.
    Example: Andy, Angela, Ryan and Kelly all have each other's login information. When Kelly is attacked at night, Ryan logs in to her account to defend, and then logs in to Angela's account as well to reinforce Kelly. This is not allowed.

    Nowhere does it say anything about location. It does say very specifically That only the account holder can have access to the account. You can only have ONE account holder on an account. If somebody else in the same house plays they need there own account. Stop trying to rewrite the rules to suit you.

    It doesn't matter if they can enforce it or not for it to be a rule and therefore make endless comforting a TOS violation no matter how it is achieved. And since it can't be done legitimately it SHOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE.
    Last edited by LordSauron; 03-08-2013 at 09:38 PM.

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordSauron View Post
    It doesn't matter if they can enforce it or not for it to be a rule and therefore make endless comforting a TOS violation no matter how it is achieved.

    Lol.. and there you have it folks. The next demand of the whiners. Making "endless comforting" (which, at some point, will define "endless" as meaning "any amount of time longer than they think you should be able to") a "TOS violation".

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordSauron View Post
    Your reading comprehension needs some serious work.
    oh the irony abounds.

    the rule you keep quoting very specifically says multiple players have each others logins.

    what i have stated very clearly twice now is that there are NOT multiple players.

    the rule is you can't share your login with other PLAYERS.

    if you can't understand what other people are saying that's fine but don't try to passive aggressively insult people when you just don't get it.

  6. #16

    Default

    I would argue, however, that multiple people playing the same account is, technically, multiple "players" (physical entities) ... even though they are using a single account (logical entity).

    There is a technical differentiation between "accounts" and "players".

    A single player can have multiple accounts (technically a TOS violation, but we know people play multiple accounts).
    Multiple players can have a single account (your example).
    Multiple players can have multiple accounts (not a TOS violation as long as they don't share login details and only have 1 account each).


    That said, however, if someone wants to live in front of the computer and "endlessly comfort" to keep their HC, then, they should be able to (as long as they are not breaking any TOS clauses).

  7. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The9 View Post
    oh the irony abounds.

    the rule you keep quoting very specifically says multiple players have each others logins.

    what i have stated very clearly twice now is that there are NOT multiple players.

    the rule is you can't share your login with other PLAYERS.

    if you can't understand what other people are saying that's fine but don't try to passive aggressively insult people when you just don't get it.
    Completely wrong. The account owner of the hypothetical account you site is the guy who clicked play to start it. The other guy is ANOTHER PLAYER even if he does not actually have his own account. Ofcourse thats just a sham anyway and really just an attempt to invent a scenario to give the botters an out as to how they can have a city comforted for weeks and somehow not be breaking any rules.

    Once again nobody can put forth an example of endless comforting that does not violate the stated rules(hint: there isn't one)
    And since it blatantly is cheating it needs to be impossible to do. The suggestion is quite valid and something like it needs to be implemented. Either that or a capcha that actually works at the least to ensure its a human at the controls and not a bot. So does anyone have an argument against loy raises requiring a capcha to make sure its not a bot doing the comfort?

  8. #18

    Default

    So the siege of 2 X 16s continues. So far its been about 4 hours of comforting with gates open for about the first 10 minutes.

    edit: Seems one of them does have some honor and let it flip when the troops ran out. Can only hope the other player takes there loss with some dignity as well.
    Last edited by LordSauron; 03-10-2013 at 05:25 AM.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Look out the window
    Posts
    759

    Default

    really a simple solution to stop "ENDLESS" comforting
    clear out the food
    no food=not being able to comfort :doh:

    Na47 - PoTaToHeAdbest - 7
    Na50 - SKORPIAN - 427
    Na55 - Potatoes - 7

    Retired from All Servers

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The9 View Post
    to poke a hole in your theory it is possible to have say a flatmate watch your account and comfort for you which is not against the rules and therefore you could in fact comfort 24/7.

    also from the way you wrote your post it makes it sound like you were attacking a city personally for days on end while someone else was supposedly cheating to comfort, but if they couldn't possibly stay online to comfort how could you stay online to attack? just sayin...
    Hmmmm...... how do you know that the city comforts for 24 hours or "for longer than a person could possibly attack"? Couldn't I just as easily accuse you of bot spamming based on your complaint, and will twelve level ten warehouses make the city unbeatable? no.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •