Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 143

Thread: IP limit suggestions (Any server welcome to participate)

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UL Baby
    Posts
    2,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SunnyG View Post
    Ok, so explain to me why implementing this on current servers, where in a short period of time, all players (aside from the few who spend their days trying to get around the limit rather than just playing...i will concede that there will be a handful of those peeps) will basically be on a more level field, is something you dont like? You said because of money...I have spent a lot of money on my account over the years as well. You still have the benefits of that money you have spent (whether it be big heroes, items you have purchased when you coined, coin still left to buy things or holiday, etc). I just dont understand why it matters if you can run 3 accounts or 300 accounts? You wont be losing money, unless you sank wads of cash into alts. And that is just goofy anyways. I just dont get why its so upsetting in the grand scheme of things...unless your goal is to have the largest upkeep city in the history of Evony. This change might put a damper on those dreams.

    I wasnt multi-posting, I was multi-replying

    I like it when its a level playing field, you ever tried playing a server where its heavily one-sided? Its boring as batchit. Thats what it'll be like on the servers with the ones who go the extra mile and bypass this limit.

    And believe it or not yes, some people do spend money on their alts, some people also buy accounts off of other people. I'm sure you're not that oblivious to this and that you do not realise Selling/Buying has become a big factor in this "game".

    You're also mistaken to believe i like having an enormous warcity.


    Multi-replying lol, either way keep it in the one post .


    By the amazing Luda

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Building a religion... a limited edition...
    Posts
    15,996

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by david_k700 View Post
    Multi-replying lol, either way keep it in the one post .
    When did you become a mod?

  3. #93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by david_k700 View Post
    I like it when its a level playing field, you ever tried playing a server where its heavily one-sided? Its boring as batchit. Thats what it'll be like on the servers with the ones who go the extra mile and bypass this limit.

    And believe it or not yes, some people do spend money on their alts, some people also buy accounts off of other people. I'm sure you're not that oblivious to this and that you do not realise Selling/Buying has become a big factor in this "game".

    You're also mistaken to believe i like having an enormous warcity.


    Multi-replying lol, either way keep it in the one post .
    Yes, I know there will still be the ones who somehow get around the limits, and keep way more troops than everyone else will be able to. But thats ok. Most of us have been around the game long enough to know how to handle all those incoming troops anyways. There will always be someone bigger than you. BUT taking all the alts away will make the server better overall. I just do not see a downside to it. You say it will become boring, well that just means you go stir stuff up

    I have indeed played on a server where it was heavily one-sided. I loved it. I learned a lot and the game was more challenging for me then, because you have to pay attention to your acct(s), keep it super productive, and actually use strategy to make sure you are competitive with the players who make up the heavily one-sided part.

    Yes I know people buy accounts, etc. But when you purchased alts/accounts, somewhere in the back of your mind you had to know there was always a chance something may happen like this (not this per ce, but bans for multi accounting, or whatever). I said in another post (one of my numerous multi-posts lol), you gamble it, you either win or you lose. This is a loss for the gamblers I suppose.

    Also, I dont pretend to assume anything about you. My comments are not personal to you necessarily, just people in general who dont support this change.

  4. #94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by acer5200 View Post
    When did you become a mod?
    Prolly after you quit.... I am baffled as to why a person would think they are skilled because they kill troops in client. Every troop kill i have ever gotten has been in client. I say let the noobs have their hundreds of accounts. You can dawn can tell me how many accounts im running right now and that numbers about one

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UL Baby
    Posts
    2,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by acer5200 View Post
    When did you become a mod?
    The same time you stopped being one.



    Quote Originally Posted by SunnyG View Post
    Yes, I know there will still be the ones who somehow get around the limits, and keep way more troops than everyone else will be able to. But thats ok. Most of us have been around the game long enough to know how to handle all those incoming troops anyways. There will always be someone bigger than you. BUT taking all the alts away will make the server better overall. I just do not see a downside to it. You say it will become boring, well that just means you go stir stuff up

    I have indeed played on a server where it was heavily one-sided. I loved it. I learned a lot and the game was more challenging for me then, because you have to pay attention to your acct(s), keep it super productive, and actually use strategy to make sure you are competitive with the players who make up the heavily one-sided part.

    Yes I know people buy accounts, etc. But when you purchased alts/accounts, somewhere in the back of your mind you had to know there was always a chance something may happen like this (not this per ce, but bans for multi accounting, or whatever). I said in another post (one of my numerous multi-posts lol), you gamble it, you either win or you lose. This is a loss for the gamblers I suppose.

    Also, I dont pretend to assume anything about you. My comments are not personal to you necessarily, just people in general who dont support this change.
    Lol i meant from the other side, being the under dog can be great fun... The group i'm with on 180 started out as the under dogs for the first month or so and now we're on top. Whats boring is when you are ontop with no one to oppose you.

    And i don't think people would expect anything like this to happen when they buy alt accounts when evonys track-record for 3-4years has been to look the other way and do nothing.
    As i said though, i'm not totally opposed to this idea. There are some things i do like; I do like though that it impacts server hoppers who only go to sell chit and not play.

    But I don't take any of your comments personally, why would i on an online forum lol. But i was being generalised from some of your comments when talking about those who opposed this change based on some of your assumptions and other peoples previous posts.


    By the amazing Luda

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Building a religion... a limited edition...
    Posts
    15,996

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iamme View Post
    Prolly after you quit.... I am baffled as to why a person would think they are skilled because they kill troops in client. Every troop kill i have ever gotten has been in client. I say let the noobs have their hundreds of accounts. You can dawn can tell me how many accounts im running right now and that numbers about one
    Quote Originally Posted by david_k700 View Post
    The same time you stopped being one.





    Lol i meant from the other side, being the under dog can be great fun... The group i'm with on 180 started out as the under dogs for the first month or so and now we're on top. Whats boring is when you are ontop with no one to oppose you.

    And i don't think people would expect anything like this to happen when they buy alt accounts when evonys track-record for 3-4years has been to look the other way and do nothing.
    As i said though, i'm not totally opposed to this idea. There are some things i do like; I do like though that it impacts server hoppers who only go to sell chit and not play.

    But I don't take any of your comments personally, why would i on an online forum lol. But i was being generalised from some of your comments when talking about those who opposed this change based on some of your assumptions and other peoples previous posts.
    Quote Originally Posted by david_k700 View Post

    Multi-replying lol, either way keep it in the one post .
    Pot, meet kettle. lol

  7. #97

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by david_k700 View Post
    Lol i meant from the other side, being the under dog can be great fun... The group i'm with on 180 started out as the under dogs for the first month or so and now we're on top. Whats boring is when you are ontop with no one to oppose you.
    I see, I assumed you meant from a smaller players perspective. Well, if 80% of the server is significantly smaller than you (you=the 20% that remain very large), and they dont challenge you ever, then it makes sense for you to downsize and stop circumventing the limits (because if you are huge then thats the only way you are staying huge), drop your alts, and play at a smaller level so the smaller players will challenge you. Seems simple to me. It seems to always go back to people wanting enormous, ridiculous troop counts. There is no need really.

    Unless I am very confused, I think this is a no-brainer.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Every Where Visa Goes
    Posts
    61

    Default

    And i don't think people would expect anything like this to happen when they buy alt accounts when evony's track-record for 3-4years has been to look the other way and do nothing.

    Evony looked the other way because bots were never as advanced as they are now ... Dawn Seeker said it all when he said bots don't spend MONEY... What he really wanted to say is that bots allow people to hero train, port farm, amulet,medal and item farm 100 times faster than a person can, meaning they now care about your multi accounts and bots because your getting free stuff and not spending as much. Never Mind that they forced the bots on players with all the wonderful changes they have made to the game. Evony Free to play and always will be!!! Lmao what they mean is you don't enter your credit card number to make an account just to keep it......
    Dam that LilMoe

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    47

    Default

    I like the theory of the idea. If evony could find a stable way of limiting account's per user, that would be great. It would take it back to the days of multi player throw downs and realistic battles. No more spending a day to kill someones 8bill an hour burn wc. If evony can pull it off in a reasonable way, i may consider playing again.

    SERVER 86 VALIANT retired
    SERVER 133 NoFNG's retired
    SERVER 145/ss69/ss88 420/DEFIANCE
    SERVER 178 420 retired
    Prestige doesnt mean ****

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UL Baby
    Posts
    2,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SunnyG View Post
    I see, I assumed you meant from a smaller players perspective. Well, if 80% of the server is significantly smaller than you (you=the 20% that remain very large), and they dont challenge you ever, then it makes sense for you to downsize and stop circumventing the limits (because if you are huge then thats the only way you are staying huge), drop your alts, and play at a smaller level so the smaller players will challenge you. Seems simple to me. It seems to always go back to people wanting enormous, ridiculous troop counts. There is no need really.

    Unless I am very confused, I think this is a no-brainer.
    That resides back to the first issue though, $$$$$

    Plus generally the 19% that are the large players are in the same alliance lol



    Quote Originally Posted by acer5200 View Post
    Pot, meet kettle. lol
    Um, i didn't multi-post?

    Unless you're stupid enough to think "iamme" is me?

    LOL, fail by you.
    Last edited by david_k700; 02-14-2014 at 02:15 AM.


    By the amazing Luda

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •