
Originally Posted by
kassikas
Sorry, but without any battle reports at all, one must believe you are just BSing.
Facts are simple, and your story has changed. First you argued that you knocked down 400k archers and 50k ballista and only lost 100k troops. Now you are saying it took hundreds of battles.
Hundreds of battles with an average loss of less then 500 troops, against armies far larger then the one that killed 50k troops? Thats required for the claim of <100k lost troops.
Additionally, how did you manage not to kill any of the horse in hundreds of attacks? I would really like to know, because my horse always finds a way to die.
Occom's razor weighs in simple here. You are BSing. You picked the bones of someone who had quit, and tried to pass it off as a victory over hundreds of thousands of troops.
Show one battle report, the first one where you hit hundreds of thousands of archers without taking tens of thousands of losses, and you might get some faith. Until then, the claims just stink.
Bookmarks