i would make them just like i would make the rest of the defenses
only use them at a certain range against certain units. 1000 warriors should die in 1 round against 3x as many archers. they don't have shields to block the arrows and i'd say at least 1 in 3 archers can hit a target. even if it takes 2 rounds your traps shouldn't be that far out away from your castle especially with neighboring castles. makes no sense.
I won't presume to speak for Nemo, but if I'm the commander in that castle and I see 100 warriors rushing at my level 10 wall, I would NOT order my men to use up the expensive Rolling Logs. I would just tell the loafers in the ATs to fire. Or better yet, break out some beer and watch football because I know those 100 warriors will die after 100 rounds even if I don't do squat. There needs to be some intelligence. If the attackers are clearly underpowered and unable to breach, simply use the ATs instead of the single-use items.
Exploit BS. If that is how the Devs have coded it, then that is how it gets played. If the Devs had a clue they would have a speed server where they would allow people to test their patches out before imposing them. Then there wouldn't be all the fuss. They should look at how some other games work, and learn from them; not just copy blindly (as they appear to have done initially).
Holy crups...
This is pretty damned funny! Following my post, my fan club shows up!
lololololol
I told ya they were stalking me!
Before I add you to my fan club, I'd like to remind you ENGLISH is the language we use around here. I, personally, prefer the use of logic instead of jumbled garbage as well.![]()
Last edited by Kempion; 06-19-2009 at 12:31 PM.
And Kemp's lack of knowledge of the game strikes again. TD's target troops too. That's why warrior waves still trigger them.
Oh, Valin, don't get your Cotex stuck. You are already in my fan club.![]()
So says the person who admitted himself publically that he is not a people person. He must feel all warm and fuzzy knowing he is as "loved" here as in rl. Reminds me of this guy in a movie, scarred, single, angry at the world and himself, arrogant and lonely. But did he change his ways? Nope, the angrier he got the more he became set in his ways and refused to see himself for what he was. Extra credit for anyone if you can name this movie.
Bookmarks