
Originally Posted by
Vecius
I'm not seeing it. I agree that my theory on starting distances is almost certainly wrong, but that post doesn't prove it. The reason the defending archers didn't target the other archers isn't because they started too far away, it's that by my targetting theory, they see the ballistas as a more significant threat.
Is it something else in there you saw? I am interested in seeing contradictions to my theories, theories are useless if they aren't correct, just don't see the one in that post.
Bookmarks