Quote Originally Posted by chinothepony View Post
Whether good or bad... at any time developers can state what they deem are exploits. It's happened in every single online game I've ever played. It still happens today.

Whether that is right or wrong, well that is up for debate. But only on the forums. You sign a TOA contract to play their game. Online gameplay may change. Nerfs happen. Exploits are called out. Changes happen.

It's apart of online gaming life.

The difference I see is in these forums Evony allows people to voice their opinions however they see fit. Be happy you're given that privilege. I've known game forums where absolutely none of that was allowed.

So you play their game. You use their forum. It's their rules. I find a little bit of myself wanting to be respectful of that.

I never argued that the Devs have a moral obligation to offer a rule set. That would be silly, just as silly as saying they have a moral obligation to reward smart tactics over stupid.

But just because you do not have a moral obligation to do something doesn't mean it isn't smart however. No company has a moral responsibility to mitigate potential customer frustration, it is just good business.

Thus the use of the word 'problems' rather then 'human rights violations!!!OMG111'