Quote Originally Posted by javasirc View Post
I think its ok how it is. One person shouldnt be able to simply bust into someone's city that easy. It should take coordination of allies, waves of troops, depending on what the enemy has, and of course numbers. The attackers should lose a lot while raiding a highly defended enemy, not just bust down the archer towers and walk in to slay the infantry.
That excuse is used too often. "Oh you should have to have multiple people to take over a big city". Yeah well they can get help from their alliance too. When you add in equal help there's still ~no way~ to effectively siege a city unless you have 20x the troops they do.

You should be able to take over someones city who has equal troops to yours, why the **** would it be any different?

Explain