Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: This game needs terrorism

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default This game needs terrorism

    ...so that beginners or people who wish to stay out of large alliances can actually have a purpose.

    Some sort of covert act availiable to players of lower rankings or limited satellites perhaps? Maybe only available to people NOT within an alliance?

    Some sort of destructive scouting mission that cannot be traced back to the
    perpetrator.

    Basically, a way to retaliate against the big bullys...you know...like in real life.

  2. #2

    Default

    I'm assuming you're the guy who mailed an envelope laced with anthrax to the high school bully?

    Anyhow, you're suggesting we give an undetectable, destructive weapon to players who're weak and useless, so that they can bully and oppress players who were in actuality better than them?

    I cannot stress how incredibly stupid and hypocritical your post is; you dislike bullies, but the moment you gain access to a position whereby you have the means to bully others, you will shamelessly abuse this to carry out acts of bullying.

    If you give all the weak players an undetectable offensive weapon; and deny this to stronger players, this in itself would already be an unfair distribution. Which is what you weaklings have been complaining about. Basically you hate that it isn't fair for YOU, and hence you come up with.....this. If I even tried to describe how disgusted you make me feel, the mods would ban me for sure.

  3. #3

    Default

    Unfair? You mean like "repeatedly plundering 'fresh out of their 7 day grace period people' with your multi-alliance forces" unfair?

    Grow up.

    Lemme guess, you're part of one of the huge alliances that is untouchable because there ISNT anything to check your "gang". (and gangs are all the alliances seem to amount to)

    Nothing hypocritical about suggesting a game mechanic that actually exists in the REAL WORLD.

  4. #4

    Default A topic name like "this game needs terrorism"

    Already shows the level of maturity you are at.

    You also managed to miss the point completely with regard to my attack on your demonstration of hypocrisy.

    You do not want stronger players using their superior military power on a weakling like yourself, so you suggest the developers to give all weaklings and noobs a superweapon with which to bully and abuse players who play this game better than they do. If you haven't detected the hypocrisy yet, I would logically infer that your lack of intelligence is the other primary reason you are terrible at this game.


    Btw, I'm the highest ranked player on my server, and I've never attacked a small player before. Want to know why? Because you're not worth my time. You have so few resources and your city is pathetic. If a top player keeps attacking a small player, the only reason should be to drive the newbie out of his area. And even if he's doing it for sadistic pleasure, too bad.

    That, you uneducated child, is what the "real world" is about.

    And have fun trying to convince everyone else that terrorism is a legitimate avenue for righteous and noble martyrs to strike back against oppressors. Real world, lol.
    Last edited by TheFelix; 08-18-2009 at 09:34 AM.

  5. #5

    Default

    Your repeatedly calling my posts childish and stupid is an amusing attempt at flame bait that I wont bite on, but lets forget YOUR bad manners and actually discuss the post.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFelix View Post
    You also mentioned to miss the point completely with regard to my attack on your hypocrisy.
    Hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is saying that "terrorism" shouldnt be in the game and then turning around and plundering a fresh player that is no match for the strength of your forces.
    You do not want stronger players using their superior military power on a weakling like yourself, so you suggest the developers to give all weaklings and noobs a superweapon with which to bully and abuse players who were better than them. If you haven't detected the hypocrisy yet, I would logically infer that your lack of intelligence is the other primary reason you are terrible at this game.
    Ignoring once again your attempt to "bait" me, the ability I'm suggesting, while not "leveling the playing feild" would give younger kingdoms a purpose and an actual way to retaliate against larger kindoms/alliances. Furthermore, it would add another facet of "realism" to the game. Larger countries are not invulnerable to smaller forces completely if you consider acts of terrorism. In this game...they are.

    Btw, I'm the highest ranked player on my server, and I've never attacked a small player before. Want to know why? Because you're not worth my time.
    ....yet it happens all the time in "Evony".
    You have so few resources and your city is pathetic. If a top player keeps attacking a small player, the only reason should be to drive the newbie out of his area. And even if he's doing it for sadistic pleasure, too bad.
    ...or to maintain superiority, which is fine. The problem here is that larger forces are able to do this with impunity. They can go unchecked against smaller forces with no fear of repercussion. The game mechanic that I'm suggesting may curb such actions.
    That, you uneducated child, is what the "real world" is about.
    I think I've clearly illustrated here why you are mistaken.
    And have fun trying to convince everyone else that terrorism is a legitimate avenue for righteous and noble martyrs to strike back against oppressors. Real world, lol.
    I will, thank you for helping me thus far with a rather inane and angry post that does little but help my postition.

  6. #6

    Default Cool, you managed to evade all my logical points by purposefully misinterpreting them

    If you even examined your suggestion with an unbiased eye, you will realise how incredibly stupid you come across. And no argument can accurately depict that.

    My contempt for you could not be described in mere words.

    I will, however, take satisfaction from the fact that your "suggestion" will be scoffed at, heaped scorn upon, and ultimately ignored.

    In fact, I was actually one of the people who disagreed with needless bullying which served little purpose. Standing on the same side with you makes me question my own belief system. Do I really want to be associated with a moron who comes up with suggestions like "this game needs terrorism" and "weak players should get an exclusive superweapon so that they can gain an unfair advantage over stronger players".

    Basically, your post is a reiteration of your stance that weak players should gain an unfair, exclusive, irrationally powerful advantage over stronger players. And your various attempts to draw a comparison with the real-world issue of terrorism shows that you are

    1) a proponent and advocate of terrorism
    2) a total retard

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFelix View Post
    If you even examined your suggestion with an unbiased eye, you will realise how incredibly stupid you come across. And no argument can accurately depict that.

    My contempt for you could not be described in mere words.

    I will, however, take satisfaction from the fact that your "suggestion" will be scoffed at, heaped scorn upon, and ultimately ignored.

    In fact, I was actually one of the people who disagreed with needless bullying which served little purpose. Standing on the same side with you makes me question my own belief system. Do I really want to be associated with a moron who comes up with suggestions like "this game needs terrorism" and "weak players should get an exclusive superweapon so that they can gain an unfair advantage over stronger players".

    Basically, your post is a reiteration of your stance that weak players should gain an unfair, exclusive, irrationally powerful advantage over stronger players. And your various attempts to draw a comparison with the real-world issue of terrorism shows that you are

    1) a proponent and advocate of terrorism
    2) a total retard

    Are you actually able to discuss a subject constructivly without verbal abuse?

    As it stands this game is WOEFULLY unbalanced and there are NO repercussions for greifing newbie Lords.

    It's not like a current MMO where lowbies have their own hunting grounds that are of no interest to higher levels.

    Indeed, if we were on the same server together, and you decided you disliked the tone of my original post enough that you REALLY wanted to get at me...as one of the top players on your server as you boast you could essentially destroy weeks of my efforts by wiping me out...AT NO RISK TO YOURSELF.

    This is balance? Fair? Who's the hypocrite? I'm simply suggesting an alternative.

    Your assumption that this suggestion will be ignored is probably correct however. Not due to the "unfairness" of terrorism, more likely due to the fact that the only way to combat bullying alliances is to slap down $30 on evony to falsly shore up defenses with the games "built-in" cheat....cents.

    ....a rather ingenious money making idea.

  8. #8

    Default

    I'm going to step in here and simply say, no, Evony is not looking at terrorism as a combat means within the combat structure. It is not at all on the development plan and will not be placed there. New players have a great place within Evony and allows established players to generate good community presence by assisting those lower in prestige and experience in the game.

    I'm closing the thread as this was in the wrong forum for starters, as well as again stating...this is not on the development plan.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •