-
Hm.. it depends on how developed your city is. If it's a city that is underdeveloped, could get attacked easily, and the 50 minutes is too far to transport goods and or troops if needed, then yes it would be the best to abandon and build one closer.
However, if it's a well thriving city, can function on it's own, I think it would be better to keep it. I say this for a few reasons such as you're spread out a little bit which can be an advantage. If somebody in your alliance is being attacking and one city is too far,the other city may be closer. Or one city may be much safer than the other and you can use that city to build up troops and such to transport to eh other city.
Myself, I have 2 cities Bavaria and 1 (maybe more after tonight) in Burgandy. 2 and a half hour transport, but still worth it because all the fighting is done in Burgandy. I can safely make troops quickly in my other cities - without worrying about somebody attacking my city in Burgandy.
It all depends on what you want to achieve in the end. If you want a kingdom that's together and looks menacing and huge, keep your cities together. If you want to be able to spread out and maybe increase your chances of helping your members, having cities far away helps with that.
One last note (Sorry know this is long - am taking over a city and bored waiting for it to happen lol) One thing you can do if you want to spread out, is make a city close to you and feed it resources and gold until it is nice a healthy, then teleport it randomly within the state. Just another little idea. I'm all for spreading out lol.
Oh, Let's do it.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks