Yes, I would like to hear some sort of clarification, but as I said... I doubt we will.

It is really in the best interest of Evony NOT to respond. As long as they leave the status quo, they retain the internal option to make judgement calls on individual cases on an individual bases. The more 'details' they give, the more they actually limit their own options in dealing with this matter. If the provide a list of specific regulation on the matter, they open themselves to dealing with a multitude of assumptions from the playerbase and... of course... those who will seek to slip through the cracks.

Keep in mind, they can ignore something when it benefits them. Once thet respond, they are obligated to that response.

I anticipate they will not respond unless they feel they can add something noteworthy that will not limit their options.... and they will continue banning (or not) based on their own internal formula.