View Poll Results: Should Evony impliment mechancis to limit the formation of superalliances?

Voters
39. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    14 35.90%
  • No

    25 64.10%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Should Evony impliment mechancis to limit the formation of superalliances?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    "OH!" "IO!"
    Posts
    8,424

    Default

    Were you there for the super war on Server 1?

    Prince of OTD.
    Founder of the Off-Topic and the SEUA.
    Earth Archmage of the Wizard Mercenaries.

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkbrady View Post
    Thas not genius, that's common sense...whoever has the biggest, scariest army under them will dominate all others...

    ...that is, until "all others" get bored of your ****e and decide to gang up on your ass...

    ...then we're talkin' super-revolution...now back in the day, whne they first came up w/ that...that was genius...
    And once that superalliance is gone, another will take it's place. And the cycle repeats.

    But really, you can't beat a super alliance. Too many players.
    Z.A.F.T.
    Zodiac Alliance of Freedom Treaty

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Posts
    3,822

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rinsam View Post
    But really, you can't beat a super alliance. Too many players.
    Super alliances...let's say the consist of the 10 highest rankin' alliances in the server...thas 100 players...
    Hell, let's say the top 50...500 players...out of...some 30k+?

    It's not that there's too many, if that the folk who run super alliances get the picture...band together and win...everyone else makes tiny alliances and gets slaughtered...they all need to band together to fight the guys who banded together otherwise it's jus' a matter of "divide and conquer" for the supers...except that all the division is already done.

    And aye, everythin' cycles through after that...eveyrthin' gets refreshed and restarted...but thas the fun, right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Satan
    I said before I need to be in the top 100 players or else I won't be able to defend myself.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Ken Deathmarr View Post
    You know, I don't understand your post sometimes ok? So I take it as a mean threat.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Alusair cave
    Posts
    2,639

    Default

    Here's a secret about superalliances: Most of the time, their armies suck, and they use intimidation to get their way. Not to mention, coordination through several alliances and several members isn't easy, and they tend to fumble and flail around blindly more often than not unless they have a really superb coordinator/s.

    While they can still be a threat for younger or inexperienced players, a single alliance of people who know what they're doing can knock the typical superalliance on its heels.
    It's all Rodri's fault.

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alusair View Post
    Here's a secret about superalliances: Most of the time, their armies suck, and they use intimidation to get their way. Not to mention, coordination through several alliances and several members isn't easy, and they tend to fumble and flail around blindly more often than not unless they have a really superb coordinator/s.

    While they can still be a threat for younger or inexperienced players, a single alliance of people who know what they're doing can knock the typical superalliance on its heels.
    Quoted for truth

    Nothing to add this sums it up perfectly.

    You get together 10-120 people who know what they are doing you will dominate 100 man clans.

    Unless they have an unreal leader who can co-ordinate all of them.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •