Through a philosophical viewpoint as well as a socio-political viewpoint, any Communist/So******t modes of government are tragically flawed. Due to the barberous propensities of human nature a so-called utopia is unable to be achieved, however, such is not the ultimate goal of Communist/So******t modes of government. Communism is a guise utilized for vulgar acts for acquiring political hegemony, political domination, and an imposition of a flawed and erroneous viewpoint upon the general populace.
A sense of human progression is intertwined with healthy competition, a toleration of values, equipollence amongst the multifarious composition of government as well as a firm maintenance of equilibrium, or general moderation in all affairs. Communism is an excessive viewpoint that throughout history has been destructive, illogical and immoderate. It is fallacious to repeat in such a cyclical mode that of terror, destruction and political turmoil.

Within the Communist political structure, the theme of "social progression" and "the victory of the proletarian over the oligarchic foundation" equates to the utilization of coercion, terror, violence, and of the overall decay of the infrastructure. In a sense, every participant within Communism is equal-equal in their political and social inferiority to the despotism and excess of the Communist regime; the populace is shackled like mere cattle to their Communist overlords. There is no need to become obsequious or subservient to such a fanatical and desperate viewpoint.

As a philosopher, I have realized that anything in excess leads to the loss of moral virtue, a dissolution of the communal and familial structure, a dilapidation of society, the loss of economic incentives as well as productivity, and a degradation of the individual [self-autonomy] to the particular Communist/So******t regime. The means of moderation, equipollence, and toleration lead to a generally more stable socio-political structure as well as a more stable government infrastructure.

One has only to look onto the Soviet state and the 'puppet states' under the hegemony of the Soviet state. The basic necessities of a good life composed of freedom and liberty are such examples as the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion that were relegated to mere insignificance and worse during the Communist/So******t period. Another good example of such excess was the French Revolution. The "Jacobin Triumvirate" of Robespierre, Danton and Marat was putrid, vulgar and horrendous. Thousands upon thousands of innocent individuals were hacked within the streets of Paris as the general populace bathed in a sea of blood. Such terror and destruction all took place because of the delusions of fanatical and desperate individuals who with their lips proclaimed freedom and social justice but whose minds were corroded, corrupt and vulgar. Edmund Burke and Friedrich Schiller knew that such forces of supposed, corroded and contorted viewpoints of social progress, liberty and freedom would lead to licentiousness by those in power, the utilization of coercion and a trampling of those very principles that such individuals seemed to profess. As in the French Revolution and the Soviet Union as well as in future attempts of establishing Communist/So******t forms of government, there will be social change-that of bloodshed, death, destruction, incompetency, etc.