Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 60

Thread: Limiting attacks

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Texas the only place to be
    Posts
    26

    Thumbs down Limiting attacks

    I have experienced a ton of attacks on all 5 of the cities I have spent the last 2 months building. I'd like maybe the creators of this game to perhaps consider a cool down period for the defenders so that they could rebuild. It is not fair to those players that have a life going on outside of evony to be attacked 50 plus times and lose their cities over nite to an alliance that has an alliance that has an alliance that has an alliance. It is a war game, and yet to be bullied by 5 or more alliances while you are off, is a little unfair. Anybody else have some suggestions?

    Dark Hans
    Republic
    Host
    Server 42 (for now)
    "And in the end it was said that there was but one man, and that man was Dark Hans."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Posts
    3,822

    Default

    Still got that edge of realism...don't go to sleep at night or you jus' might wake up dead in a mushroom cloud...

    Quote Originally Posted by Satan
    I said before I need to be in the top 100 players or else I won't be able to defend myself.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Ken Deathmarr View Post
    You know, I don't understand your post sometimes ok? So I take it as a mean threat.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    40

    Default

    yes, I suggest you eat a can of shut your mouth.

    these game suggestions are stupid, we have too many "cooldowns".

    If youre getting owned then so be it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    GRAVEYARD! i am dead!
    Posts
    486

    Default

    well if u like this game then u must play atleast 10 hours a day and be addicted like me lol if u can't afford that then u don't have to play it's a war game dude kill or be killed

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Posts
    3,822

    Default

    There's only so much one can do about these limits that are bein' suggested.

    I mean, as it is it takess like fifty attacks to cap a city. Now if that was limited then cities would eitehr be uncappable (defeatin' a huge portion of the games point) or bein' active to hit a comfortin' would place your city immune to bein' capped for however many hours (givin' defenders even more of an edge) or the limit would be high enough that it wouldnae matter anyways.

    And would it be on the player or the city? If it was the player that would severly detriment anyone's ability to actually defeat any defendin' player and the game would become a cold war state. If it was to the city, people could jus' cycle through your cities and take them one by one as they do anywyas.

    Makin' it enogh so that if the player is active hinders them puts attackers on a huge disadvantage because attackin' someone who's online is a crushin' disadvantage as it is already, w/o givin' them the ability to completely prevent you from takin' the city. That would lead to only one thing: people will wait until they know you're offline then cap every city they know you have; it would actually encourage attackin offline people. The concept would be counter-productive.

    You didnae give any real suggestion other than "add a limit". You have to build up, defend and explain your suggestion rather than jus' sayin' you want a change, but want someone else to think it up.

    Quote Originally Posted by Satan
    I said before I need to be in the top 100 players or else I won't be able to defend myself.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Ken Deathmarr View Post
    You know, I don't understand your post sometimes ok? So I take it as a mean threat.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Hans View Post
    I have experienced a ton of attacks on all 5 of the cities I have spent the last 2 months building. I'd like maybe the creators of this game to perhaps consider a cool down period for the defenders so that they could rebuild. It is not fair to those players that have a life going on outside of evony to be attacked 50 plus times and lose their cities over nite to an alliance that has an alliance that has an alliance that has an alliance. It is a war game, and yet to be bullied by 5 or more alliances while you are off, is a little unfair. Anybody else have some suggestions?

    Dark Hans
    Republic
    Host
    Server 42 (for now)

    Great suggestion, people have a life outside of Evony. Most companies have their customers in mind when they create a product, but not Evony they had something else in mind. They advertise to the working folks; yet, playing this game is like a lifetime requirement which force most adults to quit after a few weeks. I’m waiting on Age II.
    Don't hate me because I'm beautiful; hate me because... Well, okay. Hate me because I'm beautiful.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by friendly View Post
    Great suggestion, people have a life outside of Evony. Most companies have their customers in mind when they create a product, but not Evony they had something else in mind. They advertise to the working folks; yet, playing this game is like a lifetime requirement which force most adults to quit after a few weeks. I’m waiting on Age II.
    exactly.. attackers have a life.. cities will be unsurmountable if this gets implemented
    dumber forum.. sigh

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Posts
    3,822

    Default

    If what gets implemented?

    I'm still waitin' on a more specific basis on this suggestion.
    We're all jus' thinkin' our own wee ideas on it.

    What exactly would you do for this? limit to 50 attack? or 500? To the player...the city..the alliance? Or limit the number of attacks any player can make against another? Limit both? What exactly are we discussin' right now...everyone's ju's makin' their opinion on "limits"...

    Quote Originally Posted by Satan
    I said before I need to be in the top 100 players or else I won't be able to defend myself.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Ken Deathmarr View Post
    You know, I don't understand your post sometimes ok? So I take it as a mean threat.

  9. #9

    Default

    Cooldown = truce

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by proxymater View Post
    exactly.. attackers have a life.. cities will be unsurmountable if this gets implemented
    Sorry dear, I was talking about the defender and agreeing with Dark Hans , move on troll.
    Don't hate me because I'm beautiful; hate me because... Well, okay. Hate me because I'm beautiful.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •