Theory?
This isn't some wild theory I convieced; this is an actual, current, up-to-date tactic. People use this on a daily basis and have been doin' so since before I even started.
Whether it's worth it? Seriously?
If your'e attackin' someone w/ a high defence it's never worth it resource wise; you'll always lose more. Scoutbombs are a cheap, dirty method of bombn' down archers w/o killin' off your important troops. Ofc you'll lose more resources, but if you're attackin' someone who has 900k archer defence do you really expect to attack him and come out better off?
Not a chance; you attack him becasue you want him to lose his army.
900k archer defence..I'd rather throw away 7million scouts at him than send in 2million archers to their deaths.
Get it straight; this is not some wild fantasy I created; it is a current tactic. I am only even discussin' it because I was asked if my suggested counter-measure works; which it does very well.
Seriously; this isnae a thread about whether scoutbombs are worth it or a waste of time/resources, this is a thread about combat mechanics. I'm discussin' current tactics and how to counter them. If you want to talk about how scout bombs are not worth it, feel free, but I ask of you to make a new thread about it; this is not the place for in-depth discussion on current tactics.



Bookmarks