
Originally Posted by
Darkbrady
My purpose is to prove that statement wrong.
I've shown screenies of swords endin' scoutbomb attempts w/ virtually no loss and not a single scratch on an archer.
If you have the proper manshield; you are completely defended agaist scoutbombs.
Not my fault if some one-minded fool decids to build 3mil archers, 500k warriors and neglect swords altogether.
You're wrong in so many ways, there.
Scoutbombs are a waste against less than 200k archers becasue you can send in anythin' you want to kill them off.
Scoutbombs are only effective in large scale warfare. If the opponent has too few enemies you're sendin' a nuke to kill a kitten; pointless.
Build up 500k archers and have someone scoutbomb you; you'll see how devastatin' it cna be....unless you take my advice and defend your archers properly.
Ken had it right; it's not about losses, or resources or time; it's about takin' down your enemy no matter what the cost. Jus' becasue 100k archers are more resource efficient than 2mil scouts doesnae mean they're more combat efficient. It would not be a widely used tactic if it didn't work.
Bookmarks