Well, no...actually doesn't really know his stuff. All he did was repeat what I said earlier and pick on 1 poorly worded phrase of mine. The rest of what he presented was cherry picked science selected to back his claim that global warming does not exist and if it did, would be a good thing. The only person he corrected was you.
---I'll admit I used extremely simplified terms, but...we're on an internet forum for a video game, not in a serious atmospheric science discussion. Technically, you're correct. The CO2 does not absorb anything. My exact words though were:
"Carbon dioxide absorbs the energy from the sun and does not allow the heat to escape. "
The first part of that sentence is, like I said, an extreme simplification, but the main point is exactly as you say:
You continued on with:
Monte: 'It's why we stopped using CFCs. The ozone hole was the result of the breakup of 03 in the stratosphere because of the overabundance of chlorine.'
Thank you for validating that, Dawn. But then you jump off the diving board and go bat guano crazy....
Do what? We need more land? For what? We already grow/raise more than enough food to feed everyone twice over yet a billion still are starving. What are we going to use this new land for? There is more than enough land right now to provide adequate space and sustenance for all of humanity and billions more. How would the opening up of Canada and Siberia for development benefit us?
If the northern and southern parts of the globe were to raise to a more temperate climate...the areas of the Earth we use now for farming and cattle grazing would shift. What we are accustomed to now would change. The areas we have 'tamed' would become too hot to grow our regular crops and raise our livestock.
The areas around the Equator would see an increase of temperature that humans would not be able to survive without extraordinary technological changes to the land. The unlivable areas of Africa would expand, Middle and northern South America would become inhospitable and....yes, huge areas of the globe which now house hundreds of millions of people would flood and become inaccessible. North America, southern South America, mainland Europe, northern Eurasia and southern Africa would most likely be spared from any destructive high/low temperatures like Dawn suggested...but we don't know. He is taking on the role of a soothsayer and suggesting that everything will be A-OK, without any reason for believing his own claims besides hope. I have no idea if any of the things I suggest would happen will, but it is our best approximation. We cannot expect the Earth to act in a manner fitting to our needs.
There is good evidence to suggest the warming of the globe would cause a rise in volcanic and seismic activity. Plates may shift under large civilizations, plumes may appear in the center of cities. It would increase in the areas we already know about and pop up in completely new places. We cannot predict the future actions of our planet. We just don't know. We're insignificant little bugs in the course of history and have no idea how we are affecting nature, what will occur next, nor what will occur if we allow certain actions of ours to continue. To suggest with certainty any future knowledge of the actions of this planet is a sign of gross arrogance and utter ignorance.
But you didn't correct anything. You just took my short answers and expanded on them...then tacked on your fabricated beliefs. The scary thing is...there are actually people like Dawn out there making decisions on international climate policy. And your scientific background is flawed. You do not approach this topic as a true scientist, you have your fabricated belief system and there is nothing anyone can say to make you change the way you think.





Bookmarks