Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Guilty as charged

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slayer13 View Post
    But I do have a suggestion as well. For the time being, until this Age II is released, allow the use of bots solely for farming. I do believe if you take this factor of the bot alone by itself, there would be no reason to complain.
    How about just setting food consumption to 10% of current consumption. Much less mundane farming to do and no need for bots.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Belfast, N.Ireland
    Posts
    2,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pritrix View Post
    How about just setting food consumption to 10% of current consumption. Much less mundane farming to do and no need for bots.
    Only a temporary fix,
    people would obtain huge armies of 20 million or more, the standards would rise, and people would keep farming Lv10 NPCs to keep armies of 30million, and so on.

    Just making a point here; How often would you log on if you had automated NPC farming? Once or twice a day? Would that be better or worse for Evony?
    Worse

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Th0r View Post
    Only a temporary fix,
    people would obtain huge armies of 20 million or more, the standards would rise, and people would keep farming Lv10 NPCs to keep armies of 30million, and so on.

    Just making a point here; How often would you log on if you had automated NPC farming? Once or twice a day? Would that be better or worse for Evony?
    Worse
    I could be wrong but.... An army of 20 million ARCHERS would have a hard time beating a defending army of 1 million archers which would not eat too much food if food consumption were lowered to 10%. One would have to build like 1million rams which would take billions of wood and iron - which requires farming.

    But then again, there would be lots of stalemates. Or a hero lvlng race would happen.

    I think my math tells me that this game is flawed in that whatever Evony managment does, it's still going to be a "I spend too much time on this game, therefore I'm gonna quit" problem.

  4. #4

    Default

    guess this post will do, n ppl pls forgive this one, but he was actually innocent of using a bot n just found out that others in his alliance whom he thought knew better did use a macro.

    yes, i'm a bit sick, for i enjoy the gaming function of farming, eh, used to be a truck driver so it fits me well.

    n here comes the noise:

    the game said it would apoligize n compensate those who were found to be innocent, i'm waiting.

    n guys, not for macros, if your not willing to put in the time, why should you get the rewards?
    Last edited by clipper; 12-20-2009 at 12:59 PM. Reason: wanted to add

  5. #5

    Default

    True, so true.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knuckles View Post
    Me ****ing on your face, i would hardly call being submissive.

    hmmmm interesting

    but on a serious note, I too am eagerly awaiting this mythical Age 2, or at least some info on it.

    Are we gonna have to start all over?
    Is there gonna be new troops/techs/buildings available?
    How much longer are we gonna have to wait?

  7. #7

    Default

    I could defend easily against 20m archers with 1m archers depending on the circumstance. i'm going to go out on a limb and say the most you could send at a time is about 1m or so. 10 lvl 10 rallies right there, by the time your armies got completely massacred on my walls and did next to no damage to anything but traps and some random small layers you'd be in trouble. Couldn't defend against 20m scouts, but 20m archers you bet.

    It would turn the game into who could be online to get rid of the most honor the quickest. Trying to get rid of the 5m i got this morning is going to be difficult enough without giving everyon the ability to make more troops to send at me.

    As for making the npc farming automatic, who decides who get's what npc's? Right now I have over 150npc's lvl 5 that are mine alone. Noone else is close enough to hit most of them effectively but automating the farming would change all that. Assuming we could raise the npc's like little food valleys for ourselves that other people couldn't plunder without sending me a plunder report then maybe i'd be on board with the idea. But it raises just as many problems as solutions. If they didn't let other people plunder my npc's I'd have such a huge advantage the boards would light up with people demanding they un-automate npc farming.

    It's a lose-lose for evony. So why change anything when they make people angry either way?

  8. #8

    Default

    Yeah you would think your city mayor could take on task's such as raid's, defense and such, at least the ability to set task's for the mayor would be an improvement

  9. #9

    Default

    the mayor stuff is interesting, but hey let's get was is working totally right first, though at present i can think of nothing that isn't, so once again insert foot in mouth.

    but on to what is still gawing at my small brain, how can i get my spirit back up, after being falsely condemned am i asking too much for a simple apoligy (yeh, everyone is tired of hearing me rant about it, but still)

    n i still want a puppy

    n yes just to repeat myself my apoligy please, i know that legally i'm not entitled, but still (yep, that dang clip said but still again)

    n in closing for now, Xirith, i am envious, only about 60% of the time does the fine lvl 5 npc field i created return 3 mil food, but still keep on favorites n closing the window

    farm on, dude, the rewards are worth the clicking effort

    though many disagree, (yeah i know i said in closing 3 paragraphs ago, so shoot me)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •