Horscopes are for retards, so I guess thats one negetive effect of the Empire.
As for the roads, the Celtic raods didn't last. Whereas many roman roads are still being used today.
Horscopes are for retards, so I guess thats one negetive effect of the Empire.
As for the roads, the Celtic raods didn't last. Whereas many roman roads are still being used today.
"I'm not crazy, OK? I'm totally, completely sane.
Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go blow up this dead body."
Agent Washington, Red vs Blue
I hereby pronounce this the first Mexican Jumping Thread! The damn thing is all over the place!!!!!
well the empire was better
king Jerome
#1) moderators are always right.
#2) in the case that a moderator is wrong, refer back to rule #1.
#3) the moderator is always good
#4)if you think the moderator is bad, refer back to rule#3
^thanks Killerson^
"War is not about dying for your country, it's about making the other ******* die for his"
General George S. Patton
Last edited by BigBlugga; 12-28-2009 at 01:31 AM.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWMOEVdXR2o
OFWGKTA
<18:16>From [Midnight1] : whats up with kills? is he that bad of a bish?
I wanted to have all the quotes up here so I could help Brooke. Yes the Celts made roads, but it was the way the romans made theirs that makes it more meaningful towards history. They use several layers of not only stone, but of this material used under the stone to make sure weeds wouldn't come up Then after this the brick was laid out so that it looked flat, but was sloped for drainage so water didn't pile up. I believe that this method is still being used today, or at least was used until we invented some new special way. I wanted to make that clear, the Roman roads were better which is why they get the credit. Though I believe it was during the waning years of the Republic that this was made, same with the Aqueducts still used, or at least seen today. The Republic lead the way for the Empire so in the end you would have to say what do you think makes something better. The Empire had 200 years of peace and prosperity, but that would never had happened had the Republic never fallen and Caesar never taken control. I can't remember what I said before, so let me leave it at this and hopefully this leaves the road thing behind, and helps Brooke.
From a review of Famine and Food Supply in the Graeco-Roman World, key quotes: "The history of the assimilation of provinces is , in essence, the monopolisation of an existing grain production" and "The Gracchian reforms are discussed in the light of their truly revolutionary nature, both in the relationship of the implications regarding the physical mechanism of collection/dissemination of supplies and the deep seated Patrician opposition to the distribution of grain to the plebs." In other words, the seizure of grain was an institutional policy, and the distribution of grain was problematic. Agriculture was a type of power.
Additionally, this article is interesting because it suggests a number of causes and consequences of deforestation, even speculating that agricultural mismanagement was a cause of the decline of the Empire. However, it is from wikipedia, so normal caveats apply.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deforestation_during_the_Roman_period
That said, I don't know that any of this advances us further towards a definitive answer to your opening post.![]()
The Empire is better because they have the DeathStar.![]()
'Rather have an Honest Spy than a Lying Friend'
Bookmarks